Operator: Hello, and welcome to the Q3 2025 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited Earnings Conference Call. My name is Alex, and I’ll be coordinating today’s call. [Operator Instructions] I’ll now hand over to Chris Stevo, SVP, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Christopher Stevo: Thank you, Alex. Good morning and good afternoon, everyone. In a moment, I’ll hand the call over to my CEO, Richard Francis. But before I do that, it is my duty and my honor to remind you of our forward-looking statements. Today on this call, we’ll be making forward-looking statements, and we undertake no obligation to update those statements after today’s call. If you have any questions regarding forward-looking statements, please feel free to see our SEC filings under Forms 10-Q and 10-K in the relevant sections. And with that, Richard Francis.

Richard Francis: Thanks, Chris, and good morning, good afternoon, everybody. Thank you for joining the call today. On the call today, I will be joined by Dr. Eric Hughes, Head of R&D and Chief Medical Officer; and Eli Kalif, the CFO of Teva Pharmaceuticals. So starting with, as I always do, the pivot to growth strategy. This is a strategy that have guided Teva for the last 3 years, a strategy based on the 4 pillars: deliver on our growth engines, which is all about driving AUSTEDO, UZEDY and AJOVY, our innovative portfolio, stepping up innovation, which Eric will talk to you about, with the great progress we’re making across our innovative pipeline, sustained generics powerhouse and the work we’ve done to stabilize our generics business and then focus the business, and I’ll give you an update on where we are with our transformation of Teva, our $700 million cost savings programs as well as an update on TAPI.

Now moving on to the actual results. Pleased to say this is our 11th quarter of consecutive growth, up 3% in revenue to $.5 billion, and adjusted EBITDA up 6% and our non-GAAP EPS up 14%. These all compared to Q3 2024. And our free cash flow is just above $0.5 billion. I’m really pleased to say that our net debt to EBITDA is now below 3x for the first time since 2016. Now moving on to the next slide, one of my favorite slides, I have to admit. This is our 11th quarter of consecutive growth after many years of sales decline. And it’s worth noting that Q3 ’24 was a particularly difficult comparison year where we had growth of 15%. And so to grow 3% over that comp, I think, is a testament to the work we’ve done on our portfolio and a testament to the teams.

Now this puts us on track for our growth targets we set for 2027 to have mid-single-digit growth. So congratulations to the whole team that have made this happen over the last 11 quarters. Now going down a bit more detail, what’s behind this $4.5 billion revenue and 3% growth. This growth was spearheaded by our innovative products, and I’m really pleased to say that they are now worth over $800 million for the quarter, and the growth is 33% year-on-year. AUSTEDO grew an impressive 38%, reaching $618 million. UZEDY performed strongly, up 24%, reaching $43 million and AJOVY performed well, up 19% to $168 million. Global generics revenues was up 2% and TAPI was down 4%, reflecting some seasonal volatility. So now I’m going to double-click and go into a bit more detail on all of these areas, starting with AUSTEDO.

Now as you know, AUSTEDO was selected earlier this year for CMS for the 2027 price negotiation. And I’m pleased to say that agreement that we’ve concluded is consistent with our midterm expectations for AUSTEDO that we first laid out back in May 2023. And this means that we can confirm with confidence our 2027 revenue target of $2.5 billion and our peak sales target of over $3 billion. Now let’s talk a bit more about AUSTEDO in Q3. It was another strong quarter for AUSTEDO, where the team continues to perform incredibly well. The U.S. reached $601 million in Q3 ’25, growing at 38% year-over-year. And this is the first time we have passed $600 million. So congratulations to the team for all their hard work in making this happen, and it really reflects the understanding this team has of the market.

We grew TRx 11%, and we continue to see the increasing penetration of AUSTEDO XR. And it’s worth reminding everybody again that AUSTEDO XR requires fewer scripts compared to the original AUSTEDO, and that’s why it’s equally important to look at the milligrams dispensed. And as you can see, these were up 25%. Now as you see on this slide, we’ve highlighted that with 2026 approaching, we have a good sense of AUSTEDO’s 2026 formulary position, and we continue to reflect the balance between preserving value and maintaining access. So based on these strong results in Q3, we can increase our revenue outlook for AUSTEDO to $2.05 billion to $2.15 billion for the year. Now moving on to UZEDY, another exciting member of our innovative family. UZEDY continues to perform well.

Momentum remains strong as we continue to address the needs of the mild-to-moderate patients and those beyond who take risperidone. Revenues were up 24% year-over-year, and TRx was up a strong 119%. It is worth noting that revenue growth was partially impacted by a onetime Medicaid gross to net adjustment. Now this does not impact our long-term LAI franchise expectations, and we reiterate our peak sales target of $1.5 billion to $2 billion for the franchise. Now this confidence is rooted in the data. UZEDY’s NBRx is significantly above the TRx. As you know, in Q3, we also had an expanded indication for bipolar I disorder. Now to give you more guidance on how to forecast UZEDY going forward, the Q4 implied guidance of $55 million to $65 million provides a cleaner run rate for forecasting going forward due to that gross to net adjustment in Q3.

But I want to take a couple of slides just to talk about the excitement we have around our LAI, our long-acting franchise in schizophrenia. And why do we think this $1.5 billion and $2 billion is achievable? Well, it really comes down to the great work that’s been done with UZEDY already. The team here has created great traction, as you can see, with 119% TRx growth. We have a great product profile with UZEDY, and we anticipate having a similar strong product profile with olanzapine. But more importantly, the capabilities and the knowledge that has been built here, we have the same people in front of key payers, the same people in front of these key physicians, these key nurse practitioners, health care providers, patient associations, the people who look after the formulary committees.

That puts us in a very strong position. And we know and believe there’s a significant unmet need in the olanzapine for long-acting treatment. And if you put those 2 together on this slide, we have the ability with UZEDY and our long-acting olanzapine to treat up to 80% of patients who suffer from schizophrenia, whether that’s mild to moderate with UZEDY or moderate to severe with long-acting olanzapine. And just to highlight, unfortunately, 4.7 million people suffer from schizophrenia in the U.S. and Europe. So the opportunity for both brands is significant. That’s hence the reason why our confidence in the $1.52 billion remains strong. Now moving on to AJOVY. I do love AJOVY. It continues to grow strongly across all regions in what is still a very competitive market.

And there’s some nice data points here. We are the #1 preventative CGRP injectable in new prescriptions among the top U.S. headache centers, and we are the #1 preventative CGRP injectable in 30 countries across Europe and international. And so we confirm our guidance of $630 million to $640 million. Now staying on innovation. I’m going to touch briefly upon the innovative pipeline, as I know Eric will talk to you about this later, but I’m super excited about this. Why? Because it’s near term. These are late-stage assets. Olanzapine, I’ll talk to you about the filing of that this year. DARI, the good recruitment that we’re seeing to bring that to the market in ’27. Duvakitug, starting our Phase III study. Emrusolmin, great recruitment there.

But then I look across the right-hand side of the slide, and I see the potential of peak sales, and it’s over $11 billion. And I’ll remind you, that’s just for the indications on this slide. We know that duvakitug and anti-IL-15 will be pursued in multiple indications. So we really have strong growth drivers for the future for Teva. Now moving on to our generics business. Our generics business grew 2% over 2024, and this is fueled by launches as well as the growth of our biosimilar and our OTC business. Now as I reminded you before, we tend to look at this business over a 2-year CAGR just because of the inherent timing of new launches that we have in this business. Now looking at the regions, we had a very strong quarter for the U.S. It grew 7% in Q3, and that was driven by several launches and particularly strong performance of biosimilars as well as some phasing patterns for our generic Revlimid, which I would like to point out, these will not be repeated to the same magnitude in Q4.

Europe declined 5%, mainly due to some tough comparisons to the prior year where we had a number of launches and a number of tender wins, which are for 2-year periods. So it’s a 1% CAGR for the 2 years. International markets grew at 3% or 12% on a 2-year CAGR. But now I’d like to talk to you a bit about our biosimilars because we’re entering an exciting period for our biosimilars portfolio. We have — now have 10 in-line assets globally and the potential to launch 6 more through 2027. So we’re well on track to add another $400 million by 2027 as we forecasted back at the start of the year. And I want to remind you that today, we’re growing strongly in biosimilars without substantial launches or revenues in Europe, which is the largest region in the biosimilar market.

And our European pipeline will start to convert into launches and revenues and biosimilars will be a more significant driver for Teva overall after 2027. Now moving on to the fourth pillar, focus our business. We made significant progress with the Teva transformation program, and this is something we started at the start of this year. And we made a commitment to realize 2/3 of the $700 million by the end of 2026. And I can tell you we’re on track to do that. The reason why I can tell you that is because we’re on schedule to hit our 2025 goals, and that sets us up well for the start of next year. But I’ll leave Eli to go into a bit more detail later on in this presentation. Now before I hand it over to Eric, I wanted to give you an update on how we’re tracking for the 2027 targets, which we are reiterating today.

So from a revenue point of view, with the IRA negotiations now finalized, our upcoming launches and the stabilization of our generic business, we estimate that 2025 will end the year with a 3% to 4% growth range, consistent with our ’23 to ’27 mid-single-digit average growth. On OP, because of the work we’ve done of driving our innovative portfolio, I remind you, up 33% as well as the progress we made on organizational effectiveness, we are on track to our 30% margin. And this year, we will end around the 27% margin overall. And the net debt-to-EBITDA dropped below 3x, as I mentioned earlier. By the end of this year, we should be around 2.8x, well on track to hit the 2x by 2027. And with that, I will hand over to my colleague, Eric Hughes.

Eric Hughes: Thank you, Richard. Now as Richard said, we have a healthy late-stage development programs in our innovative medicines. And we’re doubling down on our efforts to execute these studies on time and efficiently. Now beginning with olanzapine LAI, we’re on track for our FDA submission later in this quarter. Our DARI program for both adults and pediatric patients is on target for enrollment by the end of this year. Our duvakitug program in partnership with Sanofi has now initiated both our ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease Phase III studies. Our emrusolmin program has now enrolled the 100 patients that we’ll need for our futility analysis by the end of next year, and then enrollment continues to do very well. And finally, our anti-IL-15 program, very exciting program with multiple potential indications in the future, where be reading out our celiac and our vitiligo studies, proof of concepts in the first half of next year.

So exciting late-stage programs. But before I go on to those in more specific detail, I do want to have a celebration for the UZEDY team for bipolar I disorder. We had an approval and an expansion of our label, which we’re very proud of. This is an innovative approach by the team using the known and well-characterized pharmacology of UZEDY plus the safety database that we have in conjunction with efficacy using a modeling and simulation approach to expand that label for patients suffering from bipolar I disorder. So a great innovative approach, very efficient execution and a great opportunity for patients to get treatment for their bipolar disease. Now on to olanzapine LAI. As we’ve mentioned, we’ve actually presented the data, both the safety and efficacy of the full program in Phase III at the 2025 Psych Congress Annual Meeting.

It was very well received. Both the safety and efficacy was right where we expected it. And most importantly, we had no cases of PDSS. And that submission is planned for the late half of this quarter. So on track and exciting opportunity for patients in the future. Moving on to our dual action rescue inhaler program for asthma, our ICS/SABA Phase III program. This is the largest study we’ve run at Teva to date. Right now, we’re on track for full enrollment of our adults and our pediatric patients at the end of this year. And remember, the real value here is the fact that in our label, we anticipate to get the pediatrics included, which is 25% of the market. And also, we’ll have a dry powder inhaler, which is a simple device to use, simply open, inhale and close.

This makes it much more convenient for both adults and particularly the pediatric patients. So a great program right on track. And as I mentioned before, we’re very excited to announce that we have now initiated both the ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease Phase III programs with our partner, Sanofi, for our duvakitug program. This is a very exciting program, very large effort by many people. The ulcerative colitis study is called SUNSCAPE and the Crohn’s disease program is called STARSCAPE. And what we’re really excited about with this program is the way we’ve designed Phase III. It includes an open label feeder arm that will enroll patients very rapidly since it’s open label and they know they get treatment, but that gets to our safety numbers very rapidly in the maintenance.

We have a favorable randomization ratio for the patients to active. We have a rerandomization design, which is really a more feasible or favorable design for multiple doses and is more reflective of clinical practice. And finally, but possibly most important of all, the entire program is based on subcutaneous injections. That’s loading dose, induction rate and then maintenance throughout the entire program. So it’s a really patient-friendly program, and it’s designed to execute quickly. I would add, we were the fastest to transition this MOA from Phase II to Phase III. So it’s all about execution now with a great program. So kudos to the team. And on to emrusolmin. I always like to start by saying emrusolmin is enrolling a patient population that is a real unmet medical need.

This is multiple system atrophy. And our differentiated molecule is targeting the very beginning of the alpha-synuclein aggregates. We have a very efficient design. Here, you can see it’s a 48-week design against placebo. And I mentioned enrollment is going very well, and we’ve already got the first 100 that will be involved in the futility analysis at the end of next year. So we’re right on track, and it’s going quickly. We’re proud that this has received fast track designation, and we’ve already got the orphan designation. So more to come. And finally, I just want to touch base on the anti-IL-15 program. This is another great homegrown antibody and program from the Teva laboratories. Right now, we’ve got it in proof-of-concept studies in celiac disease and importantly, also in vitiligo, which will read out in the first half of next year.

But the upside possibility here is multiple different indications. Remember, IL-15 is a key cytokine in the activation and proliferation of NK cells and T cells that’s believed to be involved in many different indications that you can see here. So a lot to go with IL-15, but very exciting program, and that also received fast track designation. And with that, I’m going to pass it off to my colleague, Eli Kalif.

Eliyahu Kalif: Thank you, Eric, and good morning and good afternoon to everyone. I would like to start today with the following key messages that demonstrate our consistent execution over the last few quarters, including in Q3. First, Q3 results were above solid, driven once again by our fast-growing innovative portfolio. As Richard said earlier, this was our 11th consecutive quarter of revenue growth. Second, we continue to strengthen our balance sheet and specifically reduced our net debt to below $15 billion and expanded our EBITDA, leading to the net debt-to-EBITDA of below 3x for the first time since Q3 2016. Third, we have made significant progress in our transformation programs with approximately half of our planned savings of $70 million for 2025 already achieved by Q3.

We are on track to deliver approximately $700 million of net savings by 2027 and achieve our 30% operating margin targets. And lastly, the outcome of the IRA negotiation for AUSTEDO is largely in line with our model expectation and further emphasize our conviction in achieving our revenue target of $2.5 billion in 2027 and more than $3 billion at peak for AUSTEDO. Now moving to Slide 30 to review our Q3 2025 financial results, starting with our GAAP performance. Please note that throughout my remarks, I will refer to revenue growth in local currency terms unless otherwise specified. Similar to the last quarter, I will also refer to certain results from Q3 2024 that exclude any contribution from the Japan business venture, which we divested on March 31, 2025, to help you with the like-to-like comparison of our financial results.

Our Q3 revenue were approximately $4.5 billion, growing 5% in U.S. dollars or 3% in local currency. Revenue growth was mainly driven by continued strong momentum in our key innovative products, AUSTEDO, AJOVY, and UZEDY as well as our generics products in the U.S., including biosimilars. This was partially offset by some softness in European generics as well as lower proceeds from the sale of certain product rights compared to Q3 2024. GAAP net income and EPS were $433 million and $0.37, respectively. FX movement during the quarter, including hedging effects positively impacted revenue by $106 million and operating income by $21 million compared to the third quarter of 2024. Now looking at our non-GAAP performance. Our non-GAAP gross margin increased by 120 basis points year-over-year to 55.3%.

This increase was slightly higher than our expectation, driven mainly by strong growth in AUSTEDO leading to an ongoing positive shift in our portfolio mix. Gross margin also benefited, although to a lesser extent from a shift in ordering patterns for generics Revlimid in our U.S. generics business, leading to some volume shift from the second quarter to the third quarter as well favorable FX. This strong performance in non-GAAP gross margin largely carried through the non-GAAP operating margin, which increased by approximately 70 basis points year-over-year to 28.9%. This was partially offset by higher planned investment in OpEx and impact from foreign exchange movements. Overall, we ended the quarter with a non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.78, an increase of $0.10 or 14% year-over-year.

Total non-GAAP adjustment in the third quarter of 2025 were $478 million. Our free cash flow in Q3 was $515 million compared to $922 million in Q3 2024. This decrease was mainly due to timing of sales and collection as well as higher legal settlement payments, which we have planned for this year and is reflected in our full year free cash flow guidance. Moving to Slide 31. We are making significant progress in our Teva transformation programs through a well-defined and targeted efforts to deliver sustainable margin improvements without compromising our ability to innovate and invest in our long-term growth. These programs are expected to deliver approximately $700 million of net savings between 2025 and 2027, with roughly 2/3 of these savings to be realized between 2025 and 2026.

We are well on track to achieve approximately $70 million of initial savings in 2025 with half of it already achieved by end of Q3, demonstrating solid momentum and execution. It’s important to remember that the transformation we are driving is not just about reducing the spend. It’s part of the journey to transform and modernize Teva into an innovative biopharma company and prioritizing resources towards areas that drive growth and innovation. These transformation efforts, along with the ongoing portfolio shift towards high-growth and high-margin innovative products provide a clear and credible path to achieving our 30% operating margin target by 2027, even as we continue to invest in the business. In relation to these programs, we have recorded approximately $190 million year-to-date in restructuring costs and expected an overall cash outflow of $70 million to $100 million in 2025.

Our guidance for 2025 already incorporated the impact of both expected savings and this cash outflow. Now moving to the next slide for an update regarding our strategic intent and the progress and the process to divest TAPI. As we have consistently and transparently shared with you all, we have been in exclusive discussions with a selected buyer for the sale of TAPI. At this time, we have decided not to move forward with those discussions as we were unable to reach an agreement aligned with Teva long-term priorities and interest of our shareholders. While this process did not result in a sale with this initial buyer, recent shift in the geopolitical environment and market conditions reinforce TAPI attractiveness for potential buyers. We continue to view TAPI as a valuable asset, but it’s nonstrategic to our pivot to growth priorities.

We are now initiating a renewed sale process to explore alternative options and maximize potential value creation. We will provide further updates pending a transaction or other determination. Moving on to our 2025 non-GAAP outlook in Slide 33. Our performance year-to-date reflects consistent execution across our pivot to growth priorities with a solid revenue growth, margin expansion and cash flow generation despite the tough prior year comparables in our generics business. Based on our year-to-date results and with the 2 months left in the year, we are tightening our 2025 outlook range for revenue, operating profit, adjusted EBITDA and EPS. Starting with revenue. Consistent with the direction we shared last quarter, we are tightening the full year guidance range to be between $16.8 billion and $17 billion.

Our innovative portfolio continues to perform very well, specifically AUSTEDO, driven by strong demand and our commercial execution. With the strong year-to-date performance, we are increasing our full year outlook for AUSTEDO by $50 million to $100 million to a new range of $2.05 billion to $2.15 billion, reflecting a full year growth of 21% to 27% year-over-year. However, as we discussed last quarter, we expect our global generics revenue for the full year to be flat in local currency compared to 2024. This is mainly due to the tough year comparison deals in the timing of certain launches as well softness in certain markets. Moving to the other elements of our financial outlook. With a strong year-to-date performance, we now expect our non-GAAP gross margin to be at the higher end of our guidance range of 53% to 54%.

This implies a slightly lower margin in Q4 compared to Q3, mainly due to generic Revlimid seasonality as the majority of our volume allocation was sold by the end of Q3. We’re also increasing the lower end of our non-GAAP outlook range for adjusted EBITDA, operating income and EPS, consistent with our year-to-date results and expected ongoing strength in our innovation portfolio, along with the savings from our transformation programs. While we continue to wait for clarity around potential U.S. tariffs on pharmaceuticals, including the outcome of the ongoing 232 investigation, we are encouraged by the statement so far from the administration regarding possible generics exemptions. Our 2025 guidance continue to already reflect confirmed tariffs that are in place.

We continue to expect our operating expenses to be between 27% and 28% of revenue. Our free cash flow guidance range remains the same between $1.6 billion to $1.9 billion. I would like to reiterate that our full year guidance does not include the development milestone related to the Phase III initiation of duvakitug UC and Crohn’s indications. That said, to assist you with your modeling, we want to highlight that the expected contribution from this development milestone is dependent on the timing of each of these 2 studies. Based on the current time lines, we expect to earn one development milestone in Q4 2025, with the remainder expected in Q1 2026. For Q4 2025, we expect the first development milestone to contribute $250 million to revenue and approximately $200 million to EBITDA and free cash flow, net of certain transaction-related costs.

This first development milestone is expected to contribute approximately $0.14 to the EPS. Now turning to the next slide on capital allocation. Our capital allocation approach remains disciplined and focused on supporting our pivot to growth strategy and strengthening our balance sheet. As I mentioned in the beginning, we are consistently reducing our debt while investing in our go-to-market capabilities and innovation. With the ongoing improvement in our free cash flow, we are on track to reach our net debt-to-EBITDA target of 2x by 2027 and then to sustain around that level thereafter. In addition to our ongoing deleveraging and progress towards an investment-grade ratings, our disciplined execution also position us well thoughtfully evaluate additional ways of returning capital to our shareholders.

Finally, before I conclude my review of our third quarter performance, I would like to reaffirm our 2027 financial targets. The outcome of the IRA negotiation for AUSTEDO further emphasize our conviction and provides additional clarity to deliver on these midterm goals. With that, I will now hand it back to Richard for his closing remarks.

Richard Francis: Thank you, Eli. Before I conclude, let me remind you of some of the growth drivers that we have here at Teva. As you — as we expect our innovative portfolio to continue to drive growth beyond 2027, you can see that we have a significant amount of opportunity to do this. Currently anchored on AUSTEDO, which we reiterated our target of reaching more than $2.5 billion in ’27 and greater than $3 billion in peak sales based on the conclusion of our IRA negotiations with CMS. Along with the innovative products UZEDY, AJOVY, we will continue to drive our product mix and profitability. But also to build on Eric’s remarks, we are preparing for exciting innovative product launches in the next few years, which should set a foundation for growth in years to come.

If you move on to my final slide, just some final thoughts. In Q3, in ’25, we continue to deliver on our pivot to growth strategy with the 11th consecutive quarter of growth, growing our innovative franchise at 33%. We have a clear path towards our 30% operating margin and our other 2027 targets. We’re advancing our innovative pipeline with near-term and long-term catalysts and Teva transformation is well on track to deliver the $700 million in savings we committed to. And with that, I would like to open the floor for the Q&A. Thank you.

Christopher Stevo: Thank you, Richard. Alex, if you could — sorry, Alex, if you could please go ahead with question queue and we ask if you could limit yourself to one question and one brief follow-up, and of course if there’s additional time, we’re happy to let you back in the queue for more questions. Go ahead, Alex. Thanks.

Receive real-time insider trading and news alerts

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question for today comes from Dennis Ding of Jefferies.

Yuchen Ding: Maybe one on AUSTEDO and IRA. Thanks for the comment and glad to see that you’re reiterating the long-term AUSTEDO guidance. I’m curious what additional color you can give in terms of your own internal expectations going into the negotiations and how the negotiated price relates to the current Medicare net price.

Richard Francis: Dennis, thanks for the question. Well, as I mentioned on the call, how it met with our expectations, it was in line with what we had forecast when we set the forecast back in May 2023. So we had anticipated that we would be in the list, and we would be negotiating with CMS. And so because of that, that’s why we remain very confident about hitting our $2.5 billion revenue. With regard to the latter part of your question about, I think it was net price, we’re not going to comment on that, obviously, for competitive reasons. But I’ll just reiterate the fact that we believe that we have the ability to hit our $2.5 billion in revenue, one because it’s in line with what we forecasted, but I would also like to remind everybody that tardive dyskinesia remains a highly underdiagnosed and undertreated condition.

85% of patients who suffer from this condition are not on therapy. And so we see a great opportunity to help those patients and continue to keep growing AUSTEDO in ’26 and beyond, hence, reiterating the $3 billion — greater than $3 billion peak sales for AUSTEDO. And so I think those are the things I keep in mind as you think about the future for AUSTEDO. Thank you.

Operator: Our next question comes from David Amsellem of Piper Sandler.

David Amsellem: I had a question on AUSTEDO as well. So your competitor talked on its call about this dosing creep, if you will. In other words, the per milligram pricing structure and higher doses mean more revenue per patient. And what they’ve said is that health plans are essentially catching on to that and that there is a potential migration over to the competitor product. So I was just wondering if you can give us some color on the pricing structure of AUSTEDO XR and if that’s having ramifications in terms of access to AUSTEDO XR. That’s number one. And then secondly, how is that going to inform how you’re thinking about commercial contracting for ’26 and the extent to which you might make more concessions on price just to get into a better access position vis-a-vis your competitor?

Richard Francis: Thanks, David. Thanks for the question. I’m not going to talk about what the competitors are saying. I’ll focus on what we do here at Teva. And just to highlight, AUSTEDO’s growth is much more about treating this underserved market, as I’ve said in the past, and our ability as a team to constantly execute. And I’ll remind everybody, when we started this journey back in 2023, peak sales of AUSTEDO were forecast to be $1.4 billion. And as you see, we’re going to exceed $2 billion this year. And that is down to what we’ve done as a company and the capability we have built. But when it goes to talking about the milligrams per dose, we’ve been very clear about the benefits of patients taking AUSTEDO XR and how that helps them with compliance and adherence.

And this is very much in line with also what was put in our Phase III trial to allow physicians to have the flexibility to get to the patients on the optimal dose. So what we’re seeing is just a natural progression from moving from BID to AUSTEDO XR and the physicians having that flexibility to get patients on the right dose. The final part of your question, I think, was about access. And I think I highlighted in my presentation the fact that we’re always very thoughtful about how we manage access with value. We’ve continued to do that with AUSTEDO. We’ve done that very successfully, by the way, with our other brands in UZEDY and AJOVY. And I think we have a really strong capability for doing that. But I’ll go back to what is driving our confidence in AUSTEDO is 2 things.

The capability that we have within this team within Teva and the underserved market, 85% of patients who could be on therapy are not on therapy. And those are the 2 things that we focus on. But thank you for the question, David.

Operator: Our next question comes from Jason Gerberry of Bank of America.

Jason Gerberry: So my question is just on OpEx in 2026. And it looks like the consensus has combined R&D and SG&A kind of at around $4.8 billion, so pretty much flat on a year-on-year basis. Is that consistent with how you see the cost optimizations flowing through the P&L to navigate the Revlimid roll-off? And then my brief follow-up is just, can you comment at all if AUSTEDO XR was included or excluded in IRA? I know that there was a litigation tied to that. And so I’m just wondering if you can offer any clarity there.

Richard Francis: So I’ll hand the OpEx question — so thank you, Jason, for the question. I’ll hand that to Eli to answer.

Eliyahu Kalif: Thanks, Jason, for the question. So the way to think about the development of the OpEx for ’26, we always mentioned that from now onwards, as part of the $700 million savings, part of them will go into COGS and — but the majority will go into the OpEx. And as much as we actually keep growing and able to fuel our profit, you will see us in the range between 27% to 28%. That will not change. But we will actually be able to expand our OP as well our EBITDA. So the way to think about it is that around 2/3 of the $700 million on savings we’ll be able to accomplish by end of ’26 already, but we will start to see also part of it impacting our COGS. But the main element that will move with the COGS will be actually in ’27. But I can tell you that most of the savings we’ll be able to accomplish by end of ’26 and most of them related with OpEx. And therefore, you should think about the 27% to 28% as a run rate.

Richard Francis: Thanks, Eli. And to answer your second question with regard to AUSTEDO XR being included in the IRA negotiations, the answer is yes.

Operator: Our next question comes from Chris Schott of JPMorgan.

Christopher Schott: Just to shift gears a little bit. Can you talk a little bit about your EU generic dynamics? I know you’re facing some tougher comps there this year. But I was wondering if anything has changed in those underlying markets we should be thinking about as we think about kind of the growth going forward? And just a quick follow-up. I know the TAPI process. Just a little bit more color in terms of why restart the process here versus just deciding to keep the asset. Just maybe talk a little bit about just kind of the broader appetite for these API assets in the market right now.

Richard Francis: Thanks, Chris. Thanks for the questions. So going to the EU Generics business. If I can take you back to when we started talking about Teva and our generics business back in ’23, I can remember explain to everybody, this is a market leader of scale in Europe. And so the ability to grow this business, we should think of it growing around a 2% CAGR rate just because of its scale and size. Now obviously, I was proved wrong in the last 2 years as the business grew higher than that. But that was down to a couple of factors. One is we had more launches over those years as well as we had competitors struggling to supply and because of our manufacturing capability, we could step in. And so those 2 things happen. And I think what you’re seeing versus this quarter versus the last year is sort of a similar theme.

What we have is more launches that we had in 2023 — sorry, in Q3 2024. We also had some tender wins, which are 2-year tender periods. And we also had supply issues from competitors. Those were no longer the case. So that’s how I think about it. And that’s why I go back to think about our generics business over a CAGR — 2-year CAGR because if you think about a 2-year CAGR, these things smooth out, and that’s how we think about it. And as we’ve had conversations, I always remind people that we think about our generics business going forward in that 2% CAGR period, one, because just of the scale we have. Now that said, one thing I do want to reiterate is our biosimilar business, while getting traction in the U.S., we will start now to launch and we have launched some products and biosimilars in the EU, and that will start to build momentum, more so post 2027, but we have a good pipeline coming through in Europe.

And we know that’s a mature biosimilar market. And so those are things that are going to start to maybe add to that growth in Europe going forward. But I hope that answers your question. With regard to TAPI, I’ll give that question to Eli to talk about why restart it and not keep it. So over to you, Eli.

Eliyahu Kalif: Yes. Chris, thanks for the question. So look, we were — during all the process, we were very transparent, and as we mentioned, we actually decided not to progress with exclusive discussion that we had with a certain buyer. And the reason for that is that we see TAPI as a strategic going forward for Teva in terms of our ability to keep sourcing API when it’s actually moving as a stand-alone. You need to remember, it’s not just kind of a business that we have on the shelf and you divest it and you move forward, this is strategic for us going forward and our ability to make sure that we are providing additional value on short term and long term to our future progress and growth. It’s super important. Turn out that certain elements in terms of the discussion didn’t went according to the terms that we view how the deal should move on.

And therefore, we made that decision. And also, we need to remember that the market condition now changed. Since we launched this sales process. Recent geopolitical development, as I mentioned, and some trade policies highlight some continued attractiveness for TAPI in terms of the landscape. So therefore, we decided to initiate revised strategic review and review the sales process. And as I mentioned, we’ll keep all updated and provide further updates pending the transaction or any other determination around this process.

Christopher Stevo: Maybe if I can add, just so Eli is not misunderstood there. When he says it’s strategic, what he means is they’re one of our largest API suppliers, and we need to ensure that any contract we have has the right terms, not just for the purchaser, but also for Teva going forward, both for our in-line products and our pipeline.

Operator: Our next question comes from Ashwani of UBS.

Ashwani Verma: Congratulations for the strong update. Maybe just like quickly on the 2026 revenue EBITDA, I wanted to understand like if you can continue to deliver growth on both these metrics just as a part of your long-term goals. We have Revlimid phasing out, but you have pretty meaningful cost savings outlined and also talked favorably about AUSTEDO formulary. And then just as a quick follow-up. So the 3Q AUSTEDO looks pretty strong. Is this primarily like regular way underlying demand? Or is there any type of a onetime benefit in this? Normally, you have like a pretty strong 4Q, but with this reiterated guide, it seems like it’s indicating a down quarter in 4Q.

Richard Francis: Ash, thanks for your question. So starting on the EBITDA, just to sort of remind you, and I think Eli touched upon this in his remarks, the EBITDA is driven by a couple of things next year. And I think it’s important to understand this. One is our innovative portfolio has real momentum. As I said, it was up 33% in Q3. And these are products were all growing. So we continue to see great growth rates in those. And by the way, we’ve spoken about this in the past. These are very high gross margin products. So that really does help impact the EBITDA. So that’s one. And then on the — one of the slides that Eli and I both showed is on the transformation of Teva and the organizational effectiveness. We are on track to do exactly what we set out to do in ’25, and that means that our guide to 2/3 of the $700 million net savings for 2026, we feel highly confident about.

So if you just put those 2 things together, that really gives us confidence about our EBITDA. But I would probably take this opportunity to then talk about, well, we have some other things around our generics business where now we’ve lost generic Revlimid. There are 3 components which help us drive our generics business going forward, and that is our generics, our complex and our OTC. And as we’ve mentioned in the past, we have the ability to compensate for that generic Revlimid by the end of 2027 because we have those 3 different growth drivers and the scale we have in those 3 different businesses. So I think that answers that part of the question. With regard to the one on AUSTEDO, and I think you talked about the strong Q3 and how does that impact Q4?

And was there anything behind that? I think there’s just a couple of dynamics in that. Firstly, the fundamentals of AUSTEDO are really strong. It’s really important to understand. So as you see with regard to our TRx, our milligrams, our growth rates, I think the team has continued to execute at a high level consistently. And I think we’ve seen that for quarter on quarter on quarter. Now one of the things I just would mention, and I think I mentioned on the last call, in Q3 2024 and Q2 2024, there was some channel stocking with regard to AUSTEDO XR. So that created a slightly different comparison as well as we had some slight gross to net adjustments in AUSTEDO, which are favorable in Q3 of this year. But if you take those out, it doesn’t really change the directory much of AUSTEDO.

And so I always think about looking at AUSTEDO over a yearly period, a multi-quarter period because I think we’ve been consistent in hitting our numbers and hitting our targets, and we’re very accurate about that. So that’s the way I think about it. So I don’t anticipate anything very significant in quarter 4. The one thing that we always manage as well as we can, but it’s not completely down to us is the channel. And we’ve been very disciplined in making sure the channel has the right stock, but obviously, that’s something which we don’t have complete control over, but we’ve shown good discipline there. So I hope that answers your questions, Ash, and thanks for the questions.

Operator: Our next question comes from Les Sulewski of Truist Securities.

Leszek Sulewski: So we saw the FDA propose new guidance around biosimilars to reduce comparative efficacy study and potentially speed up the approval process. So 3 questions on this for you. One, how will this updated guidance impact your long-term biosimilar strategy? And then two, on the opposing side, do you see a scenario of additional competition where we’ll ultimately see biosimilar price erosion curves resemble traditional generics? And then third, what further investments do you think are needed to give you a more competitive edge? And I guess, ultimately, do you see a scenario where the U.S. reaches a point where the BLA process and the patient access becomes just as favorable versus the EU?

Richard Francis: Okay. Yes, that was a multidimensional question. So thank you for that, Les. I think I’ll start it off, but I’ll also lead into my colleague, Eric here, who obviously is close to that because of the pipeline we have. So firstly, we’re pleased with the FDA and that initiation of removing Phase III studies. I think that’s the right thing to do. I think that helps. And that’s based on data. We have a substantial amount of data now in the development of these biosimilars across many, many products as an industry, and I think this is the right thing to do. Does it change our strategy? Absolutely not. I think it reinforces the quality of the strategy we set out for biosimilars in 2023. And to remind you what that strategy was, our strategy was to have the largest — one of the largest portfolios of biosimilars going forward, and we’re going to do that through partnerships.

We do that through partnerships because it allowed us to have the largest portfolio because it allowed an efficient allocation of capital. We also believe at the time that there was going to be uncertainty around what the future regulation was going to be. And so we didn’t want to be initiating and allocating capital to things that may no longer be needed. An example is starting Phase IIIs, which are — they’re no longer needed going forward. So I think we sort of thought about where the puck was going. We made a strategy to where the puck was going, and I’m pleased to say I think we’ve been proven right on that. But ultimately, our strategy is about having a large portfolio. As I’ve just highlighted, we have 10 in the market. We have 6 we’re going to launch by ’27, and then we’re going to have more going forward.

With regard to price erosion, I think a good analog is to look at Europe. And Europe is a very mature biosimilar market and, one, I know particularly well. And what you see there is good penetration. You see that there is some price erosion, but it hits a steady state at a certain time, which allows a high level of profitability still within this category. What I’d also highlight in that market because you did talk a bit about whether the U.S. will replicate it, is you also see an expansion of these molecules and these biologics used in patient population because they are less expensive, they’re used earlier in the treatment of these diseases. So you get an increase in volume and obviously offset some of the decrease in price. So those are just some of the dynamics.

And I do believe the U.S. will catch up to that. But when you have a broad portfolio and we’re launching more in Europe, we’re not necessarily beholden to exactly when that happens because of the scale and the size. But maybe, Eric, you could give a bit more detail on your views on this.

Eric Hughes: Yes, I can just give a few points to support what you just said. We work closely with the FDA and have frequent communications with regards to a pretty large biosimilars portfolio. We really anticipated the fact that they were going to be removing Phase III from the requirement for most programs and agree with this decision. The technical assessment really has been proven to be the most important thing when it comes to biosimilars, something we do very well. And this is going to decrease the cost of production and approval of biosimilars. It fits perfectly and facilitates the pivot to growth strategy that we put together in the past and really, it supports a lot of the good decisions we’ve made over the years about how we will do biosimilars at Teva. So it was a welcome decision. It was something we were looking forward to and really fits perfectly into the plan.

Richard Francis: Thanks, Eric. And maybe one thing I’d just like to add on, and I forgot it obviously, removing the Phase III need reduces cost significantly. But I would also like to highlight the cost for developing a biosimilar are still high, a lot higher than any other generic, any other complex generic. So I just think that the capital allocation doesn’t disappear and the cost of it doesn’t disappear. So hence, the number of people coming into the market will I still think be restricted based on that. And the ultimate is not just can you develop it and manufacture it, do you have an efficient go-to-market capability. And I think what we’re starting to show in the U.S. and we’ll show in Europe is we do have that. And that front end is very important when maintaining a growth and profitability in your biosimilar portfolio. So thanks for the question, Les.

Operator: Our next question comes from Umer Raffat of Evercore ISI.

Umer Raffat: You said CMS agreement is in line with your modeling expectations. Is it reasonable to assume that’s about 50% or so in the ballpark? And then secondly, to get to your 2027 $2.5 billion in sales, are you assuming volume gains because of this IRA cut versus Ingrezza to get to that number or not? And then finally, obviously, olanzapine, I feel like it’s taking a bit longer than we all anticipated. But at this point, is there any possibility that you could get a commissioner voucher to accelerate that? Or should we not be thinking about that?

Richard Francis: Umer, thanks for your questions. So with regard to CMS, it was in line with our expectations that we set out in 2023. You threw out a number there, which I’m not going to comment on because I think that was maybe trying to tease me out to give you a number, and I’m not going to do that. I’ll just say it’s in line, and that’s why we remain very confident about our $2.5 billion in ’27. And I remind people, greater than $3 billion peak sales. You did touch a bit about do we see volume gains within this. And this is not something we’ve — without going into the detail of our forecasting model, we go back to capturing more patients, making patients more adherent and compliant and all of those fundamentals. I think what though you have touched upon is something that we’re going to understand a bit more in January as the first wave of drugs that were negotiated and CMS start to come through and play out.

And we’ll see what are the dynamics that happen there, and we’ll use that to adjust our modeling as we go forward. And I hope, you, as others will agree, we’re very thoughtful about how we model and how we forecast. And at least over the last few years, I think we’ve been pretty accurate in what has been quite a dynamic environment. Now with regard to olanzapine, I’ll hand that one to Eric to comment on whether we could get a Commissioner’s voucher.

Eric Hughes: Yes. Thank you for the question, Umer. And to start off with, we’re right on track with what we plan for the submission of the olanzapine LAI in this quarter. With regard to your question on the Commissioner voucher, that’s one of the things we’ve been reviewing within Teva. One of the great things about Teva is we have biosimilars, a whole portfolio of generics and innovative medicines. So the potential for where we could see a Commissioner voucher is broad. So we’re reviewing that now and looking to see what the most optimal — optimally timed and valuable program is that we seek one of those out for, but more to come on that in the future.

Richard Francis: Thanks, Eric.

Operator: Our next question comes from Matt Dellatorre of Goldman Sachs.

Matthew Dellatorre: Congrats on the quarter and the AUSTEDO agreement. Maybe first on duvakitug, now that the Phase III IBD studies are up and running, how are you thinking about enrollment time lines and potential data readouts there? And then could you comment on any progress on the indication expansion strategy beyond IBD? For instance, could we see proof-of-concept studies announced over the near term? And then maybe just as my follow-up on capital allocation, could you talk about the key priorities in 2026? And as we think about the free cash flow inflection, what are the key points of focus to achieve that full year ’27 guide?

Richard Francis: Matt, thanks for the questions. I’ll hand the first one straight over to Eric on the Phase III and the potential Phase IIs.

Eric Hughes: Yes. So thank you for the question. This is one of the things I’m most excited about the design that we’ve put together with Sanofi. It’s all about execution now. As I said it earlier in my comments, this has been the fastest transition from Phase II to Phase III with regards to this MOA of all the programs out there, which we’re very proud of. So it speaks to our executional abilities in this partnership. The design itself is really designed to make sure that we maximize the enrollment with the feeder arm that it will get to our maintenance and increase our safety numbers in the program. It’s a very convenient and patient-centric design with regards to subcutaneous treatment and the rerandomization. These are all things that will make it ideally suited for patients.

And we’re also putting a lot of effort in on how we execute the program with regards to the logistics and our vendors that we use. So it’s been a really great collaboration with Sanofi. I think we’re building upon a lot of momentum and success that we have going into a Phase III program with a Phase II program that was probably had the highest numbers with regards to its efficacy and it’s the data set that we produce, these are all good signals of starting a Phase III program. So when it comes to execution, that’s what we’re going to focus on right now. And I think that we’re set up very well to be in the horse race, if not in the middle of it, but hopefully coming up very close to the beginning of it. So that’s very well suited. Now with regards to your question about other indications, it’s great to see the excitement around this MOA.

I mean one of the things about it is the fact that it could touch so many different pathway cytokine signaling pathways in multiple indications. You can see many different Phase II programs initiating now. We have a plan with Sanofi, and we’ll let you know when those studies start. For now, we’re going to keep it close to the chest. But that, in addition to the excitement around different combinations in the future is also something we’ve been thinking about heavily. But right now, to begin this discussion is all about the execution of the study, enrolling the study and making sure that we show the value in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease now.

Richard Francis: Thank you, Eric. And now on the next 2 questions on capital allocation and free cash flow inflection. I’m going to hand those to Eli. Before I do, I do like the fact that you’ve highlighted our free cash flow inflection because that is something which we are starting to communicate and people are starting to see with the growth of the company, the growth of the innovative, the decrease of the debt, the growth of the EBITDA that this ultimately changes our free cash flow position. So thanks for highlighting the Matt and seeing that. But I’ll hand on to — hand over to Eli to talk about our capital allocation going forward.

Eliyahu Kalif: Yes. Matt, thank you for the question. So first of all, I’ll start with the free cash flow. You mentioned about how we should think about that trend that we mentioned beyond ’27. There are 3 main dynamics there. First of all, it’s the mix, right? If you look on the top line and how we’re progressing with the top line and how it’s going to flow through and convert both profit into free cash flow with the innovative, I would say, portfolio that we have, and we are keeping on investing in our growth driver. The fact that the $700 million of savings is going to actually enable us to drive more efficient COGS with high gross margin as well, I would say, to optimize our OpEx. Those 2 elements are already in progress.

There are another 2 that we need to remember. One, we paid for our debt this quarter. From now until October 26, like 13 months, we don’t have any maturities, there’s $1.8 billion in October, and there is a $2.8 billion in March, May in ’27, early ’27. If you think about $4.5 billion, $4.6 billion with our current weighted cost of capital of our outstanding debt of 4.8% you get $200 million to $250 million that we’re going to take out from a run rate, both from financial expenses going forward and pure free cash flow impact. And then on top of it, our progress on our working capital, you can actually see ourselves running below 4% going from ’27 onwards on our revenue. All these actually enable us to convert high free cash flow. As far as related to next year capital allocation, we’re actually looking on more, I would say, ability to be able to compete on certain opportunities related to business development that align strategically to our portfolio and to make sure that we are able to provide value to our shareholders.

And as we move forward to make synergetic activities around that piece, we’ll keep looking on, of course, reducing our debt. And as we move forward, we might also look on some — certain other elements related to capital and shareholder returns. And we will, for sure, during ’26, and we hope also in our next earnings calls, provide some more colors around that kind of capital returns to shareholders.

Richard Francis: Thanks, Eli. Thanks, Matt, thanks for your question.

Operator: At this time, we currently have no further questions. So I’ll hand it back to Richard Francis for any further remarks.

Richard Francis: So thank you, everybody, for participating in the call. We do appreciate your interest in Teva, and we look forward to giving you update on our full year results early next year. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you all for joining today’s call. You may now disconnect your lines.

Receive real-time insider trading and news alerts

AI Assistant

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD

Q3 2025

Earnings Transcript

Find Answers

Ask about any part of the document to get insights, explanations, or key details.