Title

Presentation

Absci Corporation beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $-0.19, expectations were $-0.2.

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Duncan, and I will be your conference operator for today. I would like to welcome you to Absci Corporation first quarter 2026 business update. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise, and after the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question and answer session. Now I would like to turn the conference over to Alex Khan. Please go ahead. Thank you.

Alex Khan: Absci Corporation released financial and operating results for the quarter ended 03/31/2026. If you have not received this news release, or if you would like to be added to the company’s distribution list, please send an email to investorsasci.com. An archived webcast of this call will be available for replay on Absci Corporation’s Investor Relations website at investors.avsci.com for at least 90 days after this call. Joining me today are Sean McClain, Absci Corporation’s Founder and CEO; Zach Jonasson, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Business Officer; and Ronti Somerotne, Chief Medical Officer. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that management will make statements during the call that are forward-looking within the meaning of the federal securities laws.

These statements involve material risks and uncertainties that could cause results or events to materially differ from those anticipated, and you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. These include statements regarding the development and clinical progress of our pipeline programs, including ABS-201; the design, enrollment, product, and timelines of our ongoing Phase 1/2a headline trial of ABS-201 in androgenic alopecia; anticipated timing of interim proof-of-concept data readout for ABS-201 in 2026; the potential advancement of ABS-201 into Phase 3 development; anticipated initiation of a Phase 2 clinical trial of ABS-201 for endometriosis in 2026, and a potential proof-of-concept readout in 2027; the anticipated characteristics and product profile of ABS-201 as a drug product; our target product profile and its attributes; the potential for an expedited development pathway, including the possibility of advancing directly from Phase 1/2a into Phase 3; our plan to engage with the FDA regarding development strategy; and the potential market opportunity and commercial prospects for ABS-201.

Certain statements may also include projections regarding potential market opportunity. These estimates are based on various assumptions, including potential regulatory approval, the final approved label, and the evolving competitive landscape, any of which could cause our actual addressable market to differ materially from these projections. In addition, certain research findings discussed today reflect participant responses to a hypothetical product profile and do not represent clinical results for ABS-201. Additional information regarding the risks and uncertainties that could affect our forward-looking statements is set forth in the press release Absci Corporation issued today, our most recent annual report on Form 10-K, subsequent documents, and reports filed by Absci Corporation from time to time with the SEC.

Except as required by law, Absci Corporation disclaims any intent or obligation to update or revise any financial or product pipeline projections or other forward-looking statements because of new information, future events, or otherwise. This conference call contains time-sensitive information and is accurate only as of the live broadcast on 05/07/2026. With that, I will turn the call over to Sean.

Sean McClain: Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining us. Today, I will cover three things: where we are on ABS-201, a new addition to our prolactin pipeline, and the strategy driving both. 2026 is going to be a data-rich year for Absci Corporation with multiple readouts in front of us. Ronti will go through the headline trial and discuss early PK modeling that supports our targeted dosing frequency. At a high level, the Phase 1/2a is on track. We expect to share preliminary safety, tolerability, and PK data next month; interim 13-week hair regrowth data in the second half of this year; and full 26-week proof-of-concept data early next year. ABS-201 is not intended to compete with minoxidil. We are aiming to create a new category of hair regrowth therapy—a targeted biologic against the prolactin receptor that provides durable hair regrowth from a few injections.

If successful, ABS-201 could represent the first new mechanism of action in androgenic alopecia in nearly three decades and a fundamentally different treatment paradigm for patients. In parallel, we continue to advance towards initiation of a Phase 2 endometriosis trial in the fourth quarter. We recently launched our endometriosis Clinical Advisory Board with leaders from Yale, UCSF, Duke, and Mayo Clinic. They bring deep expertise across reproductive medicine, fertility, and translational research and will help guide ABS-201’s endometriosis program. Endometriosis has the same kind of opportunity as AGA—large, underserved, and underexplored—and ABS-201 has the potential to open up a new category of therapy there as well. As Zach will discuss, our top strategic priority is using our platform to create novel, differentiated assets.

ABS-201 in AGA and endometriosis is the clearest expression of that. We go after hard problems, novel biology, and large patient populations with real unmet need. Our platform is built for this, and our philosophy has always been simple: follow the science, and follow the data. One of the places this has taken us is prolactin biology. Prolactin biology is underexplored, underappreciated, and often misunderstood. Even inside the medical community, the name prolactin can read as narrow, and some still think of it as a lactation hormone. It is much more than that. The more mechanistic insight we have generated on prolactin, the prolactin receptor, and related pathways, the more opportunity we see for this target—well beyond AGA and endometriosis.

We have started sharing some of these insights with the medical community as part of a broader education effort. Today, we are announcing another anti–prolactin receptor antibody, ABS-202, for an undisclosed I&I indication. ABS-201 in AGA, ABS-201 in endometriosis, and now ABS-202 in I&I are just the start of our prolactin pipeline. The reason we can do this comes back to our people and our platform, OriginOne. We figured out early that having a good platform is not good enough on its own. We need the people who know how to push it, and in this industry, you also need the assets—novel and differentiated programs that can make a real difference in patients’ lives. The places where unmet need is largest tend to be where biology is most complex and underexplored, and that is exactly where our platform and our people excel.

That overlap is also where the potential return on investment is highest, both for patients as well as our shareholders. Our focus remains being an AI-native company dedicated to developing and delivering novel, differentiated therapeutic assets for patients. As we roll out our agentic AI workflows across Absci Corporation, each of our functions is scaling. Across Research, SG&A, and other functions, we are unlocking real efficiencies and new capabilities. That is the focus, and that is what we are committed to delivering. With that, I will turn it over to Ronti, who will walk through the ABS-201 clinical program. Ronti?

Ronti Somerotne: Thanks, Sean, and good afternoon, everyone. As Sean mentioned, we are pleased to share that our ongoing Phase 1/2a headline trial for ABS-201 is progressing well and tracking according to plan. As a reminder, this trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability, while secondary endpoints include PK, PD, immunogenicity, target area hair count, target area hair width, and target area darkening or pigmentation. We will also collect patient-reported outcome data from this study. In the headline trial, we have now finished dosing all four planned healthy volunteer single-ascending-dose cohorts and initiated dosing in the first multiple-ascending-dose cohort.

To date, emerging safety and tolerability data remain favorable. Additionally, preliminary PK modeling from this clinical trial supports ABS-201’s targeted dosing interval of two or three injections over a months-long period. Next month, we anticipate sharing blinded preliminary safety, tolerability, and PK data from the SAD cohorts. In that update, we plan to share clinical data that support the safety profile and anticipated ABS-201 dosing interval. In the second half of this year, we plan to disclose interim proof-of-concept data, followed by full proof-of-concept data in early 2027. The 13-week interim is, by design, a directional view. The 26-week time point is the trial’s full POC readout. Given the regenerative nature of the mechanism and our targeted dosing interval, the biology may continue to drive hair growth beyond that point, which is consistent with the long-acting profile we are working towards.

Zach will speak to how this positions ABS-201 well for commercial success. We also continue to explore plans to execute our targeted, efficient clinical development strategy, which could enable expedited clinical development with the potential of advancing directly to registrational trials following this Phase 1/2a study. With that, I will pass it over to Zach to discuss our business strategy and to provide an update on our financials. Zach?

Zach Jonasson: Thanks, Ronti. We remain focused on creating and developing therapeutic programs that offer the highest potential return on investment. Our strategic priority is the execution of the ABS-201 headline trial, which supports our future registrational study plans for AGA and our Phase 2 clinical trial plan for endometriosis. As Ronti mentioned, we plan to share an interim POC readout, including 13-week hair regrowth data, in the second half of this year. Based on the mechanism and our preclinical data, we anticipate the 13-week interim readout will give a directional view of hair growth, with the 26-week full POC providing the trial’s primary efficacy readout. Given the regenerative nature of the mechanism, we anticipate hair growth to continue beyond the 26-week time point.

Conversations with the scientific and medical community, as well as patients, continue to affirm our view of the significant return-on-investment potential for ABS-201 in AGA and endometriosis. We estimate that the capital required to advance ABS-201 through registrational AGA trials will be a fraction of the clinical costs required for other large indications, such as oncology and IBD. Moreover, we expect to be able to leverage the SAD and MAD portions of the current headline trial to support Phase 2 initiation in endometriosis, thereby saving time and cost. Considering the significant potential market opportunities of AGA and endometriosis in conjunction with our efficient development strategy, we believe that ABS-201 offers a unique and compelling ROI.

Our market research supports a significant commercial opportunity for ABS-201. In our surveys of AGA consumers and dermatologists, we evaluated a target product profile consisting of 2.5 years of hair growth following three injections of ABS-201, with a hair growth effect of approximately 35 hairs per cm² versus baseline, similar to high-dose oral minoxidil. Results from our market research support a potential total available market exceeding $25 billion annually in the U.S., with meaningful potential upside if hair growth exceeds the survey threshold. ABS-201 has the potential to significantly expand the overall AGA market as a new premium category of durable, regenerative hair growth therapy. Our market research indicates the ABS-201 target product profile would attract not only AGA consumers dissatisfied with current standard of care, but also those who elect to use ABS-201 alongside existing standard of care, such as oral minoxidil or new formulations of oral minoxidil.

Similarly, in endometriosis, ABS-201 has the potential to define a new category of therapy that has the potential to address not only pain, but also underlying disease. Endometriosis is prevalent in up to 10% of women worldwide, including an estimated 9 million women in the U.S. We believe ABS-201’s differentiated profile could support potential peak sales in excess of $4 billion. As Sean mentioned earlier, our second priority is building and prioritizing an early pipeline of differentiated programs that offer the highest potential return on investment. Accordingly, today, we are pleased to announce the deepening of our pipeline with the addition of a new anti–prolactin receptor antibody, ABS-202. This program, which leverages our prolactin biology expertise and our AI platform, enables us to expand into new indications where we believe prolactin receptor inhibition will offer a novel and efficacious treatment option.

Conversely, we have determined that certain programs no longer fit within our strategic scope, and so we will be deprioritizing development of ABS-301 and ABS-501. We will no longer commit internal capital or resources to further development of these programs. Our capital and resources will be directed toward programs that offer the greatest potential ROI within our strategy. In addition to the two previously discussed strategic priorities, we continue to advance partnering discussions associated with our other internal programs, which are at various stages of preclinical and clinical development. Overall, our strategy remains focused on executing the development of ABS-201 in AGA and in endometriosis, and then further building a pipeline of differentiated programs that provide optionality for internal development or partnering.

Turning now to our financials. Revenue in the first quarter was $200 thousand, as we continue to progress our partnered programs. Research and development expenses were $19.3 million for the three months ending 03/31/2026, as compared to $16.4 million for the prior-year period. This increase was primarily driven by advancement of Absci Corporation’s internal programs, including direct costs associated with external preclinical and clinical development of ABS-201. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $9.1 million for the three months ending 03/31/2026, as compared to $9.5 million for the prior-year period. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in personnel-related costs. Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of 03/31/2026 were $125.7 million, as compared to $144.3 million as of 12/31/2025.

Based on our current projections, we believe our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our operating plans into 2028. Our current balance sheet supports our execution of key upcoming catalysts, including potential proof-of-concept readouts for both AGA and endometriosis, and continued progress of our early-stage pipeline. We also remain focused on opportunities to generate additional non-dilutive cash inflows that could come from early-stage asset transactions and/or new platform collaborations with large pharma. In particular, we believe our early pipeline programs may offer attractive partnering opportunities. At the same time, we are aggressively implementing agentic AI workflows across our organization, including in business and scientific functions.

These implementations are already creating meaningful efficiency gains as well as capability gains. Going forward, we expect to continue to realize cost savings and productivity gains from advancement of our agentic workflows. With that, I will now turn it back to Sean.

Sean McClain: Thanks, Zach. Before we open up for questions, I want to thank the team at Absci Corporation for the work they put in each and every day. The catalysts ahead this year are: one, preliminary safety and PK data for ABS-201 next month; two, interim 13-week proof-of-concept hair regrowth data in the second half of this year; three, initiation of a Phase 2 endometriosis trial in Q4, subject to data and regulatory review; and last, continued progress on our early-stage pipeline, including our newest prolactin program, ABS-202. Looking into early 2027, we expect full 26-week proof-of-concept data for ABS-201 in AGA. We will now open the call for questions.

Receive real-time insider trading and news alerts

Operator: If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one. Thank you. Your first question comes from the line of Brendan Smith from TD Cowen. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Brendan Smith: Hi, guys. Apologies. Can you hear me now?

Sean McClain: Yes.

Brendan Smith: Thanks for taking the questions, and congrats on everything going on here. I guess maybe just a quick follow-up on the 202 conversation. Can you help us understand a little bit more, even on a mechanistic level, the most important distinctions versus 201 in terms of why it would make sense for some indications versus others, and whether there is a difference to product profile or something about actual mechanism that makes sense for that distinction? Thanks.

Sean McClain: Yes, absolutely. With ABS-202, we are creating a differentiated profile, and we also want to position this outside of AGA and endometriosis for other indications where there may be pricing differences. With regard to prolactin biology, we are very interested in how prolactin is driving some autoimmune diseases. It appears to sit on a stress–inflammatory axis and is also driving some interesting B-cell biology. You see prolactin receptor expression throughout the body—bone, immune system, endothelial cells, synovium—so we are continuing to expand the biology there as well as going into other indications with ABS-202, and additionally looking at bispecifics that could be synergistic with this mechanism.

Brendan Smith: That is super helpful. And then maybe just quickly on the upcoming MAD efficacy readout with 201. Appreciate the color on how you are thinking about some of this data. Given how the space has evolved in recent months, are you thinking comparable efficacy with clean safety and differentiated dosing is enough to win given how big the market is, or do you think you will need to show superior efficacy? Help us understand those dynamics.

Sean McClain: Yes, absolutely. Zach can touch on this more from the consumer quant study we did, but we believe having comparable efficacy to oral minoxidil with infrequent dosing would be a home-run product. That convenience factor with equivalent efficacy is compelling, and any efficacy above that increases the overall TAM of the opportunity. Zach?

Zach Jonasson: I would be happy to comment. As you know, we conducted sizable consumer surveys and surveys with dermatologists. The takeaway is that the profile of ABS-201 would establish a brand-new category of therapy based on durability, infrequent dosing, and a truly regenerative mechanism. When we test a profile with efficacy consistent with at least some reports of high-dose oral minoxidil—around 35 hairs per cm² in target area hair count—we see massive potential for adoption, and that is how we get to a potential $25 billion TAM on a TPP that looks like that. We think this product would expand the overall AGA market. Many patients dissatisfied with current standard of care would come to ABS-201, and over a third of males and females we surveyed said they would come first line, even before trying a nutraceutical.

We also saw many patients would elect to use both—an oral minoxidil in combination with ABS-201. As a premium, new category of therapy, ABS-201 is very well positioned.

Analyst: Good afternoon, and thanks for taking our questions. A little bit of a similar question as it relates to ABS-201 and ABS-202. Are there differences in pharmacokinetics or binding? Is there anything you can tell us about upgrades in ABS-202? And I have a follow-up on the ABS-201 program after this. Thanks.

Sean McClain: At this point in time, we are not disclosing the specific profile we are looking to achieve for ABS-202, other than the fact that we are planning to take this into a different indication.

Analyst: Fair enough. As it relates to the 13-week readout, another company noted “appreciable improvement” at two months. It is a qualitative measure at an early time point. Is this what we should be expecting at 13 weeks, or should we be expecting something more methodical? Thank you.

Sean McClain: The 13 weeks is really a directional readout. We want to see hair growth, and the 26-week is where we expect to see the oral minoxidil hairs-per–cm² effect. That is the final readout. The 13-week is directional, and given differences in hair growth and the mechanism, we want to reserve the 26-week as the final definitive readout.

Arseniy Shabashvili: Hi, this is Arseniy on for Vamil. Thanks for taking my questions, and congrats on all the progress. You previously talked about 90% receptor occupancy being necessary to achieve the full therapeutic effect with the prolactin mechanism. Has anything you have seen in the trial so far shifted that perspective in any way, and do you think it is ultimately achievable with the dosing schedule that you need?

Sean McClain: So far, what we are seeing supports that as achievable. Ronti?

Ronti Somerotne: We are not looking at anything like hair growth in the SAD study, and we designed the dosing paradigm conservatively. In our scaling, we are confident we can hit that 90% receptor occupancy. This is something to look forward to with the MAD data and then the hair growth data.

Arseniy Shabashvili: One more follow-up. Do you expect variability in therapeutic response among patients you enrolled—because of biomarker profile, age—or is there something about this mechanism where you think essentially every patient will respond at least to some degree?

Ronti Somerotne: At this point, we seem to have a balanced enrollment of the various stages of the Norwood classification. There is nothing from a biomarker perspective that I would expect to predict a variation in response in the AGA population. It is a reasonably sized, randomized study, and in terms of baseline hair characteristics, we are pleased with how patients are distributing amongst the arms. At this point, I am not worried about something else causing inter-subject variability in the mechanism of action itself.

Sean McClain: We have not seen any such signals in the in vivo or ex vivo experiments we have run to date either.

Analyst: Hi, how is it going? This is Alex on for Kripa. Really exciting time at Absci Corporation. Two questions from us. One, when can we expect to learn more about the mechanism and the properties and indication for ABS-202? And then also, in your consumer survey, did you specifically test for patient preference and desire for combination therapy for ABS-201 and other currently approved products? Thanks.

Sean McClain: At the moment, we are not planning on disclosing more than we have on ABS-202’s mechanism of action, though we are very excited about the overall opportunities. As we get closer to the clinic, we will disclose more, but from a competitive standpoint, we are not disclosing at this time. Zach, do you want to take the second question?

Zach Jonasson: Yes, absolutely. In the survey itself, we did not specifically segment by combination-therapy questions. What we did see, which was really exciting, is very high intent to seek out the product if available: 87% of men and 69% of women said extremely or very likely. In subgroups already on standard of care, such as oral minoxidil, those numbers went up dramatically—to 92% for men and 89% for women. We clearly see stronger interest among those already using standard of care, supporting the new-category definition where patients will look to ABS-201 either to replace standard care they are dissatisfied with or to use on top of standard care.

Debanjana Chatterjee: Hi, thanks for taking my question. I have a question on the endometriosis program. I know pain is a very common endpoint for these trials, but historically the high placebo response has been an issue with pain studies. What structural elements would you implement in this trial to control placebo response? And I have a follow-up.

Ronti Somerotne: Thanks for the question. I learned a lot in my time at Vertex overseeing the pain program there. The pain aspect of these studies is ultra important. The crux is how you execute the trial. We will spend a lot of time making sure the sites are carefully chosen, the investigators are carefully chosen, and all partners understand how to mitigate placebo response. Placebo training is really important. We will be surveilling the blinded data for evidence of a placebo response. There is a lot of operational work that is not in the protocol because these are things you have to do in execution. We have also engaged the FDA on how we are approaching mitigation of placebo response. It is really important, heavily operational, and done behind the scenes.

Debanjana Chatterjee: That is helpful. For ABS-202, I know for competitive reasons you cannot share many details, but is that something for internal development, or would you partner it given pricing differences for I&I indications?

Sean McClain: We are open to both options for ABS-202. The current plan is to pursue it ourselves, but given the opportunity and market size, we are considering both internal development and partnering.

Analyst: Hey, guys. Can you hear me?

Sean McClain: Yes, we can.

Analyst: Thanks for taking my question this afternoon. When you talk about the hair growth benchmark for success, you have guided to that for the AGA MAD portion. Can you clarify whether that benchmark is what you expect at the end of the 26th week? And if it is, can you help us think about what you would expect to see at the 13-week mark based on preclinical work?

Sean McClain: Great question. Where we want to be at 26 weeks is definitely where oral minoxidil sits. At 13 weeks, we are not putting an official guide on that; we want to see directional hair growth. Given the biology and the new mechanism, we do not want to set unrealistic expectations. The best lens is the 26-week readout, where we want to be around oral minoxidil with infrequent dosing.

Zach Jonasson: To add, our survey shows that if we have a TPP with an effect size similar to high-dose oral minoxidil—think in the 30s—with convenient dosing and durability, that is a home-run, category-defining product. There is still a product with efficacy below that as well, but the research suggests that threshold is fantastic.

Analyst: Got it. Maybe going back to the PK data you have seen so far. You said the modeling supports a few-times-a-year dosing regimen. Can you give more color on the key parameters driving that conclusion?

Ronti Somerotne: We are assessing PK from all SAD cohorts. We just started dosing the MAD cohorts, so we do not have MAD PK yet, but the SAD cohorts are developing nicely. We feel pretty good about being able to dose at least every eight weeks subcutaneously. We will have more color and a more refined estimation of dosing frequency in a few weeks when we share the data.

Sean McClain: From the preliminary half-life and PK, we are feeling very optimistic and look forward to sharing the full data in June.

Swayampakula Ramakanth: Thank you. Good afternoon, Sean and Zach. I have a couple of questions. One, you stated that you are deemphasizing oncology products. What are the reasons behind that, and what interest are you seeing from outside for these novel drugs?

Sean McClain: From a strategy standpoint, ABS-201 in AGA is a direct-to-consumer type of product, and we want to build out products that support this. I&I makes a lot of sense in that context. Oncology does not support that particular go-to-market strategy we want with AGA. We have deprioritized oncology and will not fund those programs internally, putting focus on assets that support the lead asset, ABS-201, in AGA and endometriosis.

Swayampakula Ramakanth: On partnerships, you have been talking about generating partnerships, including with large-cap pharma, but the cadence has been slower than in previous years. Are large-cap companies building their own tools, or are the economics not viable for you?

Sean McClain: Our focus is driving the clinical development of ABS-201. We are continuing to look for pharma partnerships around our pipeline, but they have to make sense for us. We are a limited team and want synergy, so we are selective about who we partner with and how they help build the portfolio and support ABS-201’s go-to-market strategy. It is a focus, but it has to be strategically sound. Zach?

Zach Jonasson: Internally, we have the capability to generate assets, and we believe we have a leading platform focused on challenging targets, as well as leadership in areas like prolactin biology. Our internal analysis shows we can generate better economic terms on partnerships focused on an asset—even at a preclinical stage—versus tying up resources for target-based platform partnerships. We have a number of assets coming toward DC this year, and several are earmarked for partnering to generate non-dilutive cash flow. The risk-adjusted NPV from creating assets and partnering those is a multiple of what it would be for platform target-based deals on a target- or program-by-program basis. The economics point us in that direction.

Analyst: Hey, guys. You mentioned adopting more agentic AI into your business. How is this impacting your drug discovery process and business operations, and any near-term cost savings you can point to?

Zach Jonasson: We are aggressively implementing agentic AI workflows throughout Absci Corporation, including in Science and R&D and across SG&A. We are already seeing significant efficiency gains and expect to realize those in cost reduction as well as capability gains on a go-forward basis. Even over the next few months, we should start realizing some of those gains.

Arseniy Shabashvili: Hi, it is Arseniy on for Vamil. One more on the hair repigmentation opportunity. You previously talked about it as roughly the same size as the AGA market. What do you expect to see there that would be clinically meaningful? Would you consider pursuing it as a separate indication with additional studies, or as an extra claim in the label in addition to the AGA indication?

Sean McClain: We are really excited about the potential for repigmentation. We see it as creating an even bigger market opportunity. Right now, it is an exploratory endpoint, and we will see how the readouts go at 13 and 26 weeks and then determine how to proceed.

Ronti Somerotne: The repigmentation data emerging elsewhere are interesting and exciting. Mechanistically, it makes sense as a potential finding. We will see what we can see and plan accordingly.

Operator: We have reached the end of the question and answer session. This also concludes our call for today. Thank you, everyone, for attending this call. You may now disconnect. Goodbye.

Receive real-time insider trading and news alerts