Title

Presentation

Vertiv Holdings Co beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $0.64, expectations were $0.615.

Operator: Good morning. My name is Nadia, and I’ll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Vertiv’s First Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Please note, this call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the program over to your host for today’s conference call, Lynne Maxeiner, Vice President of Investor Relations.

Lynne Maxeiner: Great. Thank you, Nadia. Good morning, and welcome to Vertiv’s First Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Joining me today are Vertiv’s Executive Chairman, Dave Cote; Chief Executive Officer, Giordano Albertazzi; and Chief Financial Officer, David Fallon. Before we begin, I’d like to point out that during the course of this call, we will make forward-looking statements regarding future events, including the future financial and operating performance of Vertiv Holdings Co. These forward-looking statements are subject to material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. We refer you to the cautionary language included in today’s earnings release, and you can learn more about these risks in our annual and quarterly reports and other filings made with the SEC.

Any forward-looking statements that we make today are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable as of this date. We undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events. During this call, we will also present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. Our GAAP results and GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations can be found in our earnings press release, and in the investor slide deck found on our website at investors.vertiv.com. With that, I’ll turn the call over to executive chairman Dave Cote.

Dave Cote: Good morning. I have to say I’m pleased with how we kicked off 2025. Growth and great execution are a powerful combination. Despite the market noise out there, we continue to outperform and deliver strong results. Our position in the market keeps getting stronger. Gio and the team are executing very well, and our investments in R&D and capacity are paying off. You’ve heard me talk many times about the importance of seed planning. We have consistently planted seeds at Vertiv Holdings Co. And that seed planting is paying off. As we have said before, the digital revolution is happening. It still has a long way to go. Data centers remain fundamental to all of it. AI adoption is spreading globally, data center demand remains robust, and Vertiv Holdings Co is positioned extremely well to capitalize on these opportunities.

Our portfolio technology leadership, and global scale are not easily replicated. Vertiv Holdings Co’s management team has an intense focus on speed and strong execution, and that is amplifying our competitive advantages in this fast-growing market. Additionally, it’s the only thing we do so it gets a lot of attention. There’s been a lot of turmoil lately about tariffs, which, of course, remains a fluid situation. The reality is given our market position and operational flexibility, we believe we’re well positioned to handle the tariff situation. We have a sound playbook developed over several years to manage through this situation. We have manufacturing capabilities across multiple regions, and our supply chain team has proven they can navigate these challenges.

I’m confident in our ability to handle what comes our way. All that being said, we do have to wait and see what actually transpires. We’re still early in our birth of transformation. There’s so much more value to unlock here, and we’ve got the right team and strategy to do it. We are much better than we were before. And there is still a lot of upside left to get. We’re building a great track record of consistently outperforming. But there’s still so much more potential ahead. That’s good news for all of us as investors. So with that, I’ll turn it over to Gio.

Giordano Albertazzi: Well, thank you. Thank you, Dave. And let’s go to slide three. Our Q1 performance demonstrates the strength of our business and the soundness of our strategy. It is a strong quarter. And it confirms everything we’ve been telling you about our market position, and execution capabilities. Among other things, I am very pleased with the direction of pipelines and orders and with the further backlog expansion we have driven in Q1. We have heard a lot of opinions about the market, Let me be clear. Our visibility into the data center market gives us every reason to be confident, not just for 2025 but for the years beyond. Our industry is continuing to grow, particularly around AI infrastructure. And it’s moving along the market trajectory that we shared with you at our November 2024 Investor Day.

Vertiv Holdings Co is uniquely positioned to capitalize on this trajectory. In Q1, EPS were up 49% to $0.64 driven by our increased AOP. Our organic net sales were up 25% and we believe we are outperforming market growth. Book Trebelle was a convincing 1.4 times in Q1. Our trading twelve-month organic orders growth is 20%. We’re winning in a market that shows strong demand signals. We believe the TTM trends is the right way to look at orders. Yet, I want to underline that Q1 orders were up 21% sequentially and a healthy 13% year over year against very challenging comps. The strength of these numbers reflects not just market growth, but our ability to expand our market position. Our strong growth combined with a convincing execution resulted in an adjusted operating profit of $337 million, up 35% from prior year.

We delivered another strong quarter of adjusted free cash flow at $265 million, up 162% year on year. Our balance sheet continues to strengthen which is especially important during times of uncertainty.

Dave Cote: Now let’s look at that full year ahead. We are very pleased to raise our sales growth guidance to 18%. As we know well, the tariff situation is quite dynamic and fluid. We wanted to have a credible reference point so we have based our guidance on the tariff rates in place as of April 22nd. And we have assumed they will remain unchanged for the rest of the year. We will elaborate further in the next pages. In this scenario, we have held our EPS guidance midpoint unchanged at $3.55. And expanded the range. We have held our AOP guidance center point unchanged also within the broader range. The broader guidance range reflects the uncertainty that the tariffs situation creates. However, we believe in our business fundamentals and in our ability to execute.

We have built resilience into our operations precisely for situations like this. Certainly, there are things we don’t know yet, and rather than speculate, we’ll continue to focus on what we can’t control. And we will adapt as the situation becomes clearer. We have started the year strong. And based on the demand signals from customers and technology partners, we believe that 2025 will be another strong year. With that, let’s move to slide four. We continue to see a strong end market environment that expands well beyond 2025. This is clearly a secular trend. The trajectory of pipeline and orders indicates strength in demand. As said, our TTM orders remain very convincing. Pipelines continue to grow sequentially across all regions, demonstrating we are still in the early phases of this investment cycle.

In the Americas, we are seeing strong performance with TTM organic orders up more than 30% and particularly strong pipelines. APAC, in general, continues to show order strength and pipeline growth. EMEA still lags the other regions. The dynamics we discussed in February continue. EMEA pipelines though are robust and growing. Our backlog expanded further and expands the strong yet $7.9 billion, up $1.6 billion year over year. This corroborates our growth story and the five-year model that we share at the November 2024 investor event. Let’s look at the right side of the slide. Our supply chains continue to demonstrate strong momentum and resilience across multiple dimensions. Supply chain resilience has been central to our agenda for more than two years now.

We have been driving geographical and geopolitical diversity, multisourcing, and standardization, all with a very rigorous and data-driven resilience drumbeat. As we said, we have built our supply chain and manufacturing resilience around geopolitical themes in the last couple of years. The current tariff map adds a new dimension to it. But our resilience and the muscle we have created are strong and position us well to manage the current situation. Of course, we’ll stay agile and adapt as conditions evolve. We continue to focus on the Vertiv operating system. VOS is driving manufacturing productivity efficiency, and is liberating capacity. We maintain a relentless focus on operational excellence across the organization. Let’s move to slide five.

Over the years, we have strengthened our pricing muscle and capabilities. And as said, we’re continuously optimizing our global supply. Let me take a moment to provide some clarity around our tariff mitigation strategy. Let’s look at how we supply our American business. In the US, we have strong local capacity, and we continue expanding it. We have capacity in Mexico, Most of our Mexico capacity and production is already USMCA 40 and we are driving towards a 100% qualification goal. A single-digit portion of our demand is sourced from China. And we are deploying or have already deployed lower tariff or no tariff alternatives. A small portion of the US demand comes from other regions, predominantly from EMEA, and of course, that is being optimized.

The agility and efficacy we have developed over the last couple of years is helping. But we’re not standing still. We have a comprehensive set of actions underway. We’re working towards US Senate and CA qualification for the remaining portion of our Mexico-based supply chain. We are actively rebalancing our global supply chain towards low or no tariff regions, and we’re strategically relocating production while leveraging our US manufacturing footprint. The commercial aspects of tariff mitigation are important. We have already taken some price actions in the market and will take more as necessary. Discussions with our customers about existing orders pricing actions where needed are also part of the mitigation strategy. We believe the impact of these mitigating actions will compound as the year progresses.

Although the tariff environment remains fluid, our goal is to significantly mitigate the effect of tariffs as we enter 2026. But do not get me wrong. This is complicated, and there is a very large number of moving parts. We have established a detailed tariff playbook that allows us to monitor and respond to evolving trade dynamics. And with that, over to David.

David Fallon: Alright. Thanks, Gio. Turning to slide six, this page summarizes our first-quarter financial results. All metrics are significantly improved from last year’s first quarter, including adjusted diluted EPS at $0.64. As Gio mentioned, up 49% from last year and $0.04 better than our guidance. The increase in EPS was primarily driven by higher adjusted operating profit, but also positively influenced by lower interest expense in part due to the term loan repricing last year. Moving to the right, organic net sales were up 25% from last year’s first quarter. Driven by strong growth in the Americas and APAC. We overdrove sales guidance by over $100 million facilitated by available capacity, and strong operational execution.

Adjusted operating profit was up $88 million or 35% from last year. And that was primarily driven by the higher volume. And the 130 basis point expansion in adjusted operating margin was primarily due to operational leverage. Another strong quarter for adjusted free cash flow as we generated $265 million, $164 million higher than last year. And that drove a free cash flow conversion of over 100%. We experienced strong collections at the end of the quarter with a good portion of that accelerated a few weeks from Q2. Which does create a potential headwind for next quarter. We expect free cash flow for the first half of 2025 to be roughly of 2024. And finally, on this slide in the bottom right-hand corner, our net leverage currently stands at 0.8 times.

As we mentioned previously, we believe our strong balance sheet, debt profile, and cash generation qualify us for an investment-grade credit rating right now and we are pleased to announce that Fitch agrees with us as they recently launched ratings on Vertiv Holdings Co Debt at investment grade triple B minus. This provides additional flexibility with our capital structure, improves our borrowing capabilities, and frankly, it is a testament to how far we have come with our cash generation profile. We always manage our capital structure in the best interest of shareholders, and this investment-grade rating amplifies our ability to do exactly that. Next, turning to page seven, This slide summarizes our quarterly segment performance. As mentioned, continued strong top-line growth in both Americas and APAC including China while EMEA’s growth lagged the other two regions primarily due to slower AI infrastructure build as we discussed in the fourth quarter.

Nonetheless, we remain optimistic about the future growth in EMEA as orders pipeline continues to expand at an encouraging pace. Adjusted operating margin increased from last year’s first quarter across all three regions, with operational leverage the primary driver. And the 160 basis point expansion in the Americas was despite the incremental cost of tariffs. Moving to page eight, we this slide summarizes our second-quarter guidance. We expect continued top-line momentum including 15% sequential quarterly growth and 21% growth from last year’s second quarter. With both the Americas and APAC once again growing more than 20% year over year, we continue to be prudent with growth expectations in EMEA. Tariff costs will certainly accelerate in the second quarter from the first quarter.

And with limited time to mitigate with either supply chain or commercial countermeasures, our adjusted operating margin will be negatively influenced. If tariff rates in effect today remain in effect for the entire second quarter, We expect adjusted operating margin to be 18.5% about 110 basis points lower than last year’s second quarter. However, excluding the estimated net tariff impact, adjusted operating margin would show good expansion. Which implies that tariffs more than explain the year-over-year reduction. And underlying margin expansion drivers including operational leverage, productivity, and commercial execution remain strong. And we believe we continue to be on track for our long-term margin targets. And finally, despite the negative impact from tariffs, our second-quarter adjusted operating profit is still growing 14% and our adjusted diluted EPS is still growing an impressive 21% from last year, strong growth even in a world without tariffs.

Next, moving to page nine. This slide updates our full-year 2025 financial guidance. In summary, compared to prior guidance, we are increasing top-line projections and including estimated net tariff costs. First, we are increasing full-year sales guidance by $250 million including approximately $150 million organically and approximately $100 million from favorable foreign exchange. The $150 million increase in organic sales is driven by both the first-quarter beat and higher expectations in the second quarter versus what was implied in our prior guidance. Regionally, we are increasing full-year expectations for both the Americas and APAC while lowering projections for EMEA. Full-year organic sales growth is now expected to be 18% at the midpoint, two percentage points higher than our prior guidance.

We are maintaining our full-year guidance for adjusted operating profit at $1.935 billion at the midpoint, This guidance assumes that tariff rates in effect yesterday remain in effect for the remainder of the year. Of course, adjusted operating profit will be favorably influenced by the higher sales volume, In addition, we have higher expectations for productivity. But we also include provision for the potential negative net impact of tariffs for the remainder of the year. Including the cost of tariffs themselves, offset by planned supply chain and commercial countermeasures. We are reducing our full-year guidance for adjusted operating margin to 20.5% at the midpoint approximately 50 basis points lower than prior guidance, of course, primarily driven by the estimated net impact of tariffs offset by favorable operating leverage on higher expected sales.

This all translates into us into maintaining our adjusted diluted EPS at $3.55 at the midpoint. Which is consistent with prior guidance. And 25% higher than prior year despite the impact of tariffs. Once again, good growth for most years, but particularly impressive considering the uncertain and fluid environment. As Gio mentioned, still plenty of uncertainty and a ton of work to do but we believe we are very well positioned to respond to the challenges which is a good segue to the next slide. Slide ten.

Giordano Albertazzi: So which due to the dynamic nature of the tariff environment, this slide depicts our adjusted operating profit under various scenarios. Of course, we anchor to our base guidance from the prior page, which is highlighted in blue here on page ten. With the high end and low end of the adjusted operating profit guidance primarily driven by the upper and lower ends of the sales guidance on the previous slide. Once again, this guide assumes that the tariffs in place will yesterday remain in effect for the remainder of the year. We also illustrate a few other scenarios to our base guidance, including an upside scenario of $2.015 billion at the top of the slide. And this is primarily driven by sales opportunities above the high end of our sales guidance.

Which is consistent with our continued favorable view of the market and growing orders pipeline. We also include two potential downside scenarios on this slide. One where we include provision for potential risk related to supply chain and commercial countermeasures. And another below that where we estimate the potential negative impact is April second reciprocal tariff rates that were subject to a ninety-day pause are indeed reinstated. Clearly, uncertainty remains, and there continues to be a lot of moving elements. But we believe these scenarios provide directional guardrails for possible outcomes. So with that said, I turn it back over to Gio.

Giordano Albertazzi: Well, thank you. Thank you, David. And stay for a moment still on page ten. I just wanna add that we believe the guidance you will see in bold here is the place to anchor to. And I’m very encouraged by the speed of execution and the rigor of execution that Vertiv Holdings Co is displaying in handling changing conditions. Let’s go to slide eleven now. Let me recap, and then I’ll add a couple of very important comments. A few points really stand out from our first quarter. We exceeded our guidance for Q1, sales and profitability. The strong momentum we built throughout 2023 and 2024 continues. Our order performance was particularly encouraging, and so our book to bill ratio at 1.4 times. Strong organic sales growth and margin expansion are expected to continue in Q2, 2025 and throughout the year.

We’re raising our full-year organic sales growth expectation to 18%, That is supported by the strong backlog and the pipelines we see across our business. Profitability, and on profitability, we continue to expand operating margin expansion despite the potential tariff headwinds. We have developed playbooks to address various scenarios. We remain focused on operational and commercial execution. Very importantly, we expect our strong free cash flow generation to continue. This gives us flexibility to invest further. The market remains robust particularly in the data center space, and we are well positioned to capture this growth opportunity while delivering on our commitments to expand margin and generate strong cash flow. Now let me share some exciting news about projects with iGenius.

Here, NVIDIA and Vertiv Holdings Co are delivering a fully prefabricated AI factory. This is a very important sovereign AI supercomputer. And we provide everything infrastructure from liquid cooling to heat rejection, grid to chip power in a very rapidly deployable modular infrastructure. All leveraging our NVIDIA co-developed AI reference design. What makes this truly special is how it brings together all our core Vertiv Holdings Co strengths. Our ability to deliver complex solutions at scale, our deep technical expertise, and our commitment to innovation. We’re not just providing infrastructure, We are enabling iGenius to deploy advanced AI models in highly regulated industry. I invite you to take a closer look at our iGenius project solution in the quite cool video linked from both yesterday’s press release and indeed on this deck.

This video really showcases the scope of our solution. And the unique end-to-end capabilities of Vertiv Holdings Co. We talk about partnership and partnership is crucial. And working together and closely with NVIDIA, we are advancing AI factory design. Through digital twins and simulation. All connected directly to Vertiv Holdings Co Solutions. We are delivering the technology that enables the future generations of AI. We are helping our customers to stay one or more GPU generations ahead. We enable customers to plan infrastructure before silicon lands with deployment-ready design ready for increased rack power density. We’re not just participating in the market evolution. We are actively shaping it. So we remain humble. About the work ahead.

We’re laser-focused on delivering on our commitment, We remain confident in the long-term vision we shared with you last November. We have started the year strong and we believe that 2025 is shaping to be another strong year. With that, Nadia, let us begin Q&A session. Thank you.

Operator: Of course, we will now begin the question and answer session.

Scott Davis: In order to ask a question, please press star then the number one on the telephone keypad. And if you have a follow-up question, please rejoin the queue. We’ll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A. Our first question goes to Scott Davis of Melius Research. Scott, please go ahead.

Giordano Albertazzi: Thanks. Good morning, guys.

Operator: Hey, Scott.

David Fallon: Congrats on navigating through this mess unscathed so far. It’s gonna be a hard question to answer perhaps, but when you think about, I think, your guide for incremental margins because of these tariffs is, like, I’ll call, 13% or so for 2Q. How do you see the mitigation efforts you know, from slide five? How do you see that phasing in through 2025, assuming there’s no change? Obviously, there could be a change in DC tomorrow. But assuming steady state, how do you see that improving, that mitigation kind of that you’re sequential improvements there. And is some of that mitigation perhaps some repricing of contracts or making sure that new contracts that are sized are priced or a higher price or have surcharges. Trying to get a sense of that, and I’ll pass it on. Thanks.

Operator: Thanks, Scott.

Giordano Albertazzi: Yes. Clearly, as I mentioned, as we were going through the slides, the impact of the countermeasures really compounds as we go through the year and the quarters. Clearly, there are two fundamental dimensions to the countermeasures. One is I’ll start from where you started the price. And there is, of course, price actions on new contracts, new opportunities, price actions in the market. Some we have already implemented. More we likely will continue to implement. And there is certainly an element of existing backlog with pricing when needed, not always needed. And, you know, conversations are ongoing in that respect. There is a very important element to the tariffs mitigation aspect that has to do with the supply chain.

And, you know, soon as this was evident and we started to understand which direction tariffs were going, as you said, not always easy, and certainly not always stable, But we pulled the reconfigure as needed to supply chain lever. And that but, of course, there is a lag between the very rigorous approach we have taken and we continue to take to shape our supply chain to match at best the tariff situation and the benefits. That come from that. So, clearly, this lag is such that the impact will be greater as we progress through the year. So I don’t know. David, if there’s anything you wanna add here or

David Fallon: No. And just big picture, you know, we do anticipate the dollar impact of tariffs to sequentially the net impact of tariffs to sequentially decline as we go through the year. And then the margin impact even more so as we’ll gain the leverage on the higher sales and the back half of the year versus the first half.

Scott Davis: Thank you.

Giordano Albertazzi: Okay. I’ll pass it on. Thank you. Good luck. You. Gio, if I could just get yeah, Gio, if I could just add pursuing your comment in the transcript, though, your intent by year-end. In terms of tariff neutrality? Yes. Confirmed.

Operator: Absolutely.

Scott Davis: Thank you. The next question goes to Amit Daryanani of Evercore. Amit, please go ahead.

Giordano Albertazzi: Yep. Thanks a lot, and congrats on a nice sprint. You know, I guess my question is really around, you know, you folks have had really impressive performance on orders both sequentially and year over year based basis given some very different compares you had. Can you just you know, do you talk about what’s driving the strength and really the durability of growth you seeing over here because it does stand out in contrast to all the noise that that was out there in terms of know, hyperscalers potentially canceling leases and stuff. So I’d love to understand what’s driving this trend if you saw any pull in, and how do you think about the durability here? Thank you. A lot of the start with the durability. As I as I mentioned, our pipelines are growing.

And it is sequentially growing quarter on quarter. So the another aspect of the pipeline that is interested in not only pipelines are growing in what we call the next twelve months orders so that that are scheduled to land in the next twelve months, but also beyond. So there is also an elongation that gives us more visibility in the future. So that is a positive, and it’s a positive that talk to durability. At the same time, you know, there is a certain we say that the reason why we talk in terms of trailing twelve months is because we talked about lumpiness. Orders, and we’ve been talking about that for now a good year. And that’s still the case. So there could be an order that flip one side or a large order flips one side or the other side of a quarter, and that changes your short-term profile.

One thing that is interesting about when we look at our pipeline pipeline velocity, that’s pretty stable. So that means that nothing very significant in terms of stuff being pulled in. Let’s look at it as sometimes the lumpiness works in a direction. Sometimes it works in another direction. What matters is the long-term trajectory. And again, as I said, long-term trajectory for me confirms our five-year model that we shared with you in November and then again in February. And defactored today.

Amit Daryanani: Hello? Thank you. The next The next question goes to Steve Tusa of JPMorgan. Steve, please go ahead.

Steve Tusa: Hey, guys. Good morning. How are you?

Giordano Albertazzi: Hey. Is it very well?

Steve Tusa: Just a one detailed one and then a bit bigger picture, but the detailed one, can you just maybe give us a little more granular color around kind of the absolute China import exposure. Sure. You said kind of a single-digit percentage of, I guess, what you’re sourcing to come through US factories? Would that be, like, a couple hundred million bucks? And then are you like, how much is price and how much is, you know, moving the supply chain around as far as mitigation? And then point number two, I think going back to the last question, which was a bit more, you know, macro, what do you think you’re bringing to bear to you know, gain market share? And do you believe you are gaining market share that’s kind of what it seems like with even just the trailing twelve-month type numbers seems like you guys are gaining market share. What part of the portfolio do you think is resonating most with our customers?

Giordano Albertazzi: I had to take notes of all the kind of how can I say? Angles of your question here, Steve. We will not be specific about the exact number of what is shows from where, but I think what we shared on page five explains the fact that the exposure is certainly something that we are managing and addressing. When it comes to the supply reconfiguration and price elements of our countermeasure, I would say it’s a good combination of the two. And, again, both contribute to the impact. We gaining market share? We believe so. Again, we refer back to our November markets growth figures that we shared with all of you and those continue to be very relevant and proven fairly current can absolutely still represent our best view of the market.

And relative to our growth rates, relative to that. Are certainly higher. What brings to bear this growth? Think it’s really the combination of things that we talked about several times. We know the space very well. That drives, of course, technology that is suited for the needs of the market. In terms of again, I go back to my example of the corporation with Nvidia, but also the Genius case that we represent here, is understanding what the future technology looks like and being able to provide technology that addresses that. Being ready for future silicon is an important element. We are a recognized leader, so we are at the tables. We have a strong we have a very strong service offering and very let let’s say, very high stakes infrastructure and compute requires very very reliable partner in they find our customer find it in Vertiv Holdings Co. And we scale.

I think these are the element, Steve.

Steve Tusa: Thank you.

Operator: The next question is he just Sprague of Vertical Research. Jeff, please go ahead.

Jeff Sprague: Thank you. Good day, everyone. Hey. Just a quick follow-up on some of that last point, and I’ve got a different question. I know you don’t wanna get into the individual kind of pieces of where you’re sourcing from where, but perhaps you or David could just tell us what is the total gross tariff related pressure, you know, that’s in you know, that you’re facing in 2025 here. Obviously, you’ve kinda told us what you think the net effect is, but what is the total gross number you’re trying to counteract against?

David Fallon: Yeah. Yeah, Jeff. This is David. We’re not gonna disclose to that level of specificity. I can reiterate what Gio mentioned is that we’re very focused on reducing the gross impact through two buckets of countermeasures. One being pricing, the other with the supply chain countermeasures. Both take some time, but we’re absolutely focused on both of those levers. And know, just to repeat what Gio said, the reducing impact is pretty equally split between both of those.

Jeff Sprague: Got it. So my main my question is really on the balance sheet. Your operating results and everything stand out. But the other thing that jumps off the page, right, is the shape of the balance sheet and a zero in the share repurchase column and the cash flow statement. I guess we could kind of you know, take a couple things away from that. A, perhaps you’re singularly focused on achieving investment grade before you do anything else or perhaps you know, you see some significant M&A, you know, on the horizon. Otherwise, it’s kinda hard to understand why you wouldn’t have bought back any stock with this sort of really significant dislocation in your shares.

Giordano Albertazzi: Yeah. Let me tell you real quick. Clearly, these are you know, there is a lot of fluidity in the market in general. These are uncertain times and certainly having a strong balance sheet and cash is very important. We have a very active as I mentioned a few times already, M&A pipeline. But specifically on the repurchase, considering the importers are in cash in times of uncertainty. There were moments in which the price would have suggested that, but those moments may have coincided with blackout periods. So, again, in this, as we’ve stated a couple of times already, probably ten times already, so bear with us, is about being opportunistic. When it comes to repurchase.

Jeff Sprague: Got it. Thank you.

Operator: The next question goes to Andrew Obin of Bank of America. Andrew, please go ahead.

Andrew Obin: Yes. Hi. Good morning.

Giordano Albertazzi: Hey. Good morning. Andrew, Andrew. I just yeah.

Andrew Obin: Yeah. So there were pretty public headlines about delays in cancellations from a prominent hyperscaler. And just can we get just some details? You know, what are you seeing on your end, and how are you dealing with capacity that becomes available does it get pushed out or, you know, do multi-tenant? And slash caller guy step up? Does it go to other hyperscalers? Can you just explain to us, you know, how do you manage your production slots given the dynamic in the market that know, I think has been pretty well covered in the press. Thank you.

Giordano Albertazzi: Thank you, Andrew. So yeah, we do not talk specifically about any individual customers or players. What we see again, being generic given the fact it would I want a specific be specific to an individual customer is as you saw from the orders, as you saw from the backlog, we have demand. And it’s demand that is suggesting we increase in our year on year growth as you saw. So that means that you know, our capacity is being increased and made available as you saw in Q1 sales growth. There is more capacity, and we are delivering more to the market. And we really look at the market is the demand is quite spry. It’s spread now that it may have been a year ago. A year and a half ago. There are certainly hypers in self-build.

There is colo for hyperscalers, but increasingly not only. And don’t forget that all the new cloud let’s say, space that is promising. Stubborn as in our McKays example, is started to happen and enterprises don’t show interest in AI and infrastructure in general. So you know, it’s pretty normal that sometimes someone refaces something. We pretty much have demand to cover any gaps. But, again, I’m not talking specifically for one customer. And then in general, we should go on a product line by product line basis to see exactly how that answer question should be answered. But too much detail at that stage to disclose.

Andrew Obin: Oh, thank you. I appreciate the answer.

Operator: The next question goes to Nicole DeBlase of Deutsche Bank. Yeah. Thanks. Good morning, guys.

Giordano Albertazzi: Good morning. Hey, Nicole. Can we just talk a little bit about the ability to go back and reprice the backlog? What’s baked in from a contract if you started to have those conversations know, have customers been somewhat understanding of what’s happening and I guess how much of a risk that part of the equation is since the backlog is, you know, pretty robust. Thank you.

Giordano Albertazzi: Yeah. The conversations are ongoing. Some of the conversations are ongoing. Where that need exists. Clearly, you know, contracts are supporting, sometimes more, sometimes less, Every single, contour is a different situation. But what we see is that, in general, there is an understanding that this is a particularly challenging or unique moment. Also, that is also true in the customer. It is true in the customer base. So we believe that we have fairly assessed the risk on the, let’s say, price countermeasure. In our guidance and the range we get it. And again, we’re going down that path in a very collaborative but also in a very focused fashion. So we stay very positive that what we have modeled and that results into the guide that we’ve shared with you is will happen, and the early signs are going that direction.

Nicole DeBlase: Thanks, Jill. I’ll pass it on. The next question goes to Andy Kaplowitz of Citigroup. Andy, please go ahead.

Andy Kaplowitz: Good morning, everyone. Good morning. Julia, you obviously had a strong book to bill in Q1 of 1.4 times, but you mentioned that Europe in terms of better bookings is still lagging behind. I think at a recent conference, you talked about the European environment getting a little friendly. And today, you mentioned that your European order pipeline is a little better. So would you expect larger bookings going forward still mostly coming from the US or do you see Europe starting to contribute at some point this year in all ultimately, does the overall landscape you’re seeing still support a book to bill over one times moving forward.

Giordano Albertazzi: The second part of your question again. Sorry, Andy. I’m not sure I cap something glitched in the line or something.

Andy Kaplowitz: Oh, it’s just about overall, will you get bookings more still from the US, or do you think that Europe starts to contribute this year? And can you still support a book to bill over one times moving forward?

Giordano Albertazzi: Well, thank you. So when it comes to Europe specifically, I remember that probably that comment that you’re referring to is the kind of a regulatory environment, hopefully, becoming a little bit more friendlier. We were probably right after the Paris meeting convention that Macron had just called. So it’s almost like people are waking up to a challenging situation and certainly an unfavorable situation. But those things are probably slower to move than anyone here would wish. But again, I am encouraged by the pipelines. Which speed that will accelerate You know, let’s we remain cautious and that caution you have seen in the comments about Europe growth that David made. Is it gonna is growth all coming from the US?

Well, the Americas have certainly is an engine and continues to be an engine for growth and pipelines are very encouraging. But Asia is definitely not to be snipped at. And we are we’re glad to see China accelerating. We are certainly very impressed by what we see in Asia and general. Oh, and I would add also India. India, quite strong. The second part of your question about the book to bill greater than one, yes, we believe that we will have a book to bill greater than one in the year. And, again, this is very consistent with our long-term trajectory. That is certainly favored by backlog building backlog year on year. And we believe this is what will happen also in 2025.

Andy Kaplowitz: Thank you.

Operator: The next question goes to Nigel Coe of Wolfe Research. Nigel, please go ahead.

Nigel Coe: Oh, thanks. Good morning. Thanks for the question. I think this might be for David, but Gio, if I’m taking on a financial question, please weigh in as well. So just based on the 2Q guidance based on the 2Q guidance, and sort of we can sort of back into what you’re inferring for the net tariff impact, It seems like the bulk of the impact is landing in 2Q, I’m guessing, because the mitigating factors aren’t really kicking in. I’ve then assumed that there’s a follow spill through into 3Q, but it feels like 4Q you’re more or less mitigating the impact. Just conceptually, is that the right framework? And then if I just clarify Jeff’s comments on the credit rating, Is the desire to get that rating, you know, higher Are there other circumstances where you’ve been in the large contracts with some of these large DC customers where the credit rating’s really important?

David Fallon: Yeah. I’ll start with the tariff impacts appreciate the question, Nigel. You know, unquestionably, the highest net tariff impact from a dollar perspective will be in Q2, and that will mitigate as we go through the year. So and that’s primarily related to the timing of implementing the countermeasures, both pricing on book and ship and backlog. And then also as it relates to changes with the supply chain. Our target is to be tariff neutral as we exit the year, but there should still be some net tariff impact in the full 4Q you know, with the expectation of or the hope to be tariff neutral as we exit 2025. As it relates to the credit rating, I would say we do have ambitions to be investment grade, getting that rating from Fitch was a good start.

I think we’re one step below investment grade at S&P a couple notches at Moody’s. You know, there are definitive benefits in being an investment grade, and that’s related to the availability of the debt. And you mentioned another benefit, Nigel, and that’s related to credit in the eyes of customers. Although I don’t lay awake at night based on our balance sheet and where we are today, that’s a significant issue with customers. But it never hurts. So we’ll take it one step at a time, and at the end of the day, we’ll always do what’s in the best interest for investors as it relates to our balance sheet and use of capital.

Giordano Albertazzi: Yeah. And, thank you. And, Nigel, let me comment specifically on our rating and the impact or influence on contracting with large customers. I would say that especially last couple of years, the financial strength of Vertiv Holdings Co is well recognized, and that has already been recognized also by the rating agencies. So I would say that of course, everything helps, but that’s really not a problem today. Investor grades make us stronger, so we like it for the reasons that David explained. But you know, it’s not a necessary condition today, and we’re recognized as a very strong player in the industry also from a financial stability standpoint.

Nigel Coe: Great. Thank you.

Operator: The next question goes to Chris Snyder of Morgan Stanley. Chris, please go ahead.

Chris Snyder: Thank you. Appreciate the question. Maybe just a high-level one here. What do you guys think is the best way for all of us to track liquid cooling demand in the market? You know, is it Blackwell shipments? And if that is, you know, what we should be looking at, You know, my understanding is you guys do would lead the chip shipments by some period of time. But just any color on, you know, that relationship. Thank you.

Giordano Albertazzi: Well, certainly, such Blackwell is a good Blackwell shipments is a good proxy. But as you were saying, we proceed that deployment or, anyway, the demand for liquid cooling proceeds that the deployment, especially when it’s liquid cooling that is not in rack with a cooling distribution units that are not in rack. Which case, pretty much, the CDU demand and the Blackwell demand coincide. But it’s not just but it’s not just Blackwell shipments. There are other chips, some proprietary chip, AC the silicon, that is more and more requiring liquid cooling or able to work with liquid cooling. So it’s a little bit multifaceted. But certainly, Blackwell is a good place. Blackwell shipments are a good place to start and think in terms of probably six to three months before that happens is when we see our demand turn into deliveries.

Yeah. Thank you. But we’re pretty happy about the trajectory of this technology and this product line. I’m actually very happy. The way it’s unfolding right now.

Chris Snyder: Yeah. Definitely. I really appreciate all that color. Thank you. Yeah.

Giordano Albertazzi: So let’s take one more. And I Let’s see. How are you?

Operator: Thank you. The next question goes to Noah Kaye of Oppenheimer and Co Inc. Noah, please go ahead.

Noah Kaye: Thank you all. And, hopefully, we can put a wrap on this topic. But, Gio, you’ve been quite clear from your opening comments that you see overall pipeline and demand trends are consistent with your investor day trajectory? In the past, the company’s talked about the market environment by segment, and maybe that addresses some of the questions people are raising here about hyperscalers behavior. Are you seeing any signs of overall cloud and colo demand scaling back or slowing down If so, is there any replacement strength coming from other segments to speak of to keep the overall trajectory on track?

Giordano Albertazzi: I would say that Colo Colo Cloud, and we always talk about the two combined, continues to be pretty strong. And again, we were talking about a 15, 17% expected growth rate over the five-year period with a colo cloud and that’s pretty much what we see as of now. Important to, again, reiterate the message that there are other dimensions to the demand that are maybe not strictly call or cloud that are starting to move. So, again, I don’t wanna you know, it’s very much aligned with the will wall we shared with you in November, and things aren’t told good. Thank you.

Noah Kaye: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. That’s all the questions that we have time for today.

Operator: This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the call back over to you at Gio Albertazzi, for any closing remarks.

Giordano Albertazzi: Well, thank you. And thank you everyone for listening and for the questions. It’s just that I’d like to add a couple of things. And first and foremost, our commitment to customer success to operational excellence, and, of course, shareholder value creation has never been stronger. And it’s also for me to proceed to thank the more than thirty thousand hardworking, committed focused Vertivians, I am absolutely proud of what we all are doing and achieving. So with that, thank you to everyone for your continued trust in Vertiv Holdings Co, and have a great day.

Operator: Thank you. This conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.