Title

Presentation

Operator: Good day, and welcome to the Federal Signal Corporation First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. Please note, this event is being recorded. I’d now like to turn the conference over to Ian Hudson, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Ian Hudson: Good morning, and welcome to Federal Signal’s first quarter 2023 conference call. I’m Ian Hudson, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Also with me on the call today is Jennifer Sherman, our President and Chief Executive Officer. We will refer to some presentation slides today as well as to the earnings release, which we issued this morning. The slides can be followed online by going to our website, federalsignal.com, clicking on the Investor Call icon and signing into the webcast. We have also posted the slide presentation and the earnings release under the Investor tab on our website. Before we being, I’d like to remind you that some of our comments made today may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to the Safe Harbor language found in today’s news release and in Federal Signal’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

These documents are available on our website. Our presentation also contains some measures that are not in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles. In our earnings release and filings, we reconcile these non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures. In addition, we will file our Form 10-Q later today. I am going to begin today by providing some detail on our first quarter results before turning the call over to Jennifer to provide her perspective on our performance, market conditions and out outlook for the remainder of the year. After our prepared comments, Jennifer and I will address your questions. Our consolidated first quarter financial results are provided in today’s earnings release. In summary, we delivered strong financial results for the quarter with double-digit year-over-year net sales and earnings growth, gross margin expansion, a 130 basis point improvement in adjusted EBITDA margin and new records in orders and backlog.

Consolidated net sales for the quarter were $386 million, up $55 million or 17% compared to last year. Organic sales growth for the quarter was $44 million or 13%. Consolidated operating income for the quarter was $39.5 million, up $11 million or 39% compared to last year. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $54.5 million, up $12.3 million or 29% compared to last year. That translates to a margin of 14.1% in Q1 this year, up from 12.8% last year. GAAP EPS for the quarter was $0.45 per share up $0.12 per share, or 36% from last year. On an adjusted basis, EPS for the quarter was $0.46 per share up $0.12 per share, or 35% from last year. Order Intake for the quarter was outstanding and we again reported record orders, surpassing the previous high, which we set in Q1 last year.

In total orders in Q1 this year were $475 million, an increase of $22 million or 5% compared to Q1 last year. Backlog at the end of the quarter was $968 million, another all-time high for the company and an increase of $216 million or 29% compared to Q1 last year. In terms of our group results, ESG’s net sales for the quarter were $319 million of $45 million or 16% compared to last year. ESG’s operating income for the quarter was $37.6 million, up $10.8 million or 40% compared to last year. ESG’s adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $51.2 million, up $11.9 million or 30% compared to last year. That translates to an adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter of 16.1%, an improvement of 180 basis points compared to last year, despite higher chassis revenues, which represented a year-over-year headwind of approximately 40 basis points.

ESG reported total orders of $396 million in Q1 this year, an improvement of $8 million or 2% compared to last year. SSG’s net sales for the quarter were $67 million up to $11 million or 19% from last year. SSG’s operating income for the quarter was $12.1 million, up $4.2 million or 53% compared to last year. SSG’s adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $13.2 million, up $4.3 million or 48%. That translates to an adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter of 19.8% towards the upper end of SSG’s new target range and up 390 basis points compared to last year. SSG’s orders for the quarter were $79 million, up $14 million or 21% compared to last year with much of the increase resulting from the receipt of a large fleet order for public safety equipment from a customer in Mexico.

Corporate operating expenses for the quarter were $10.2 million compared to $6.2 million last year with about half of the increase resulting from unfavorable changes in fair value adjustments of post retirement reserves. Turning now to the consolidated income statement, where the increase in sales contributed to a $20.1 million improvement in gross profit. Consolidated gross margin for the quarter was 24.9%, a 200 basis point increase over last year. As a percentage of sales of selling, engineering, general and administrative expenses for the quarter, were up 30 basis points from Q1 last year. Other items affecting the quarterly results include a $300,000 increase in amortization expense, a $400,000 increase in acquisition-related expenses, a $500,000 reduction in other income, and a $3.4 million increase in interest expense.

Tax expense for the quarter was $7.3 million up $200,000 from the prior year. Our effective tax rates for the quarter was 21% compared to 25.7% last year, with the reduction primarily due to a $900,000 increase in excess tax benefits associated with stock-based compensation activity and the recognition of a $500,000 benefit associated with changes in tax reserves. At this time, we expect our full year effective tax rate to be between 24% and 25%, excluding any additional discreet tax benefits. On an overall GAAP basis, we therefore earned $0.45 per share in Q1 this year compared with $0.33 per share in Q1 last year. To facilitate earnings comparisons, we typically adjust our GAAP earnings per share for unusual items recorded in the current or prior quarters.

In the current year quarter, we made adjustments to GAAP earnings per share to exclude acquisition related expenses. On this basis, our adjusted earnings for the quarter were $0.46 per share compared with $0.34 per share last year. Looking now at cash flow, we generated $7 million of cash from operations during the quarter, which was about the same level as Q1 last year, despite a meaningful increase in rental fleet investment during the quarter to support anticipated strength in rental and used equipment demand. We ended the quarter with $337 million of net debt and availability under our credit facility of $415 million. Our current net debt leverage ratio remains low even after funding the acquisitions of Blasters and Trackless. With our financial position remaining strong, we have significant flexibility to invest in organic growth initiatives, pursue strategic acquisitions and return cash to stockholders through dividends and opportunistic sharing purchases.

On that note, we paid dividends of $5.5 million during the quarter reflecting a dividend of $0.09 a share, and we recently announced that we are increasing the dividend by 11% to $0.10 a share in the second quarter. That concludes my comments and I would now like to turn the call over to Jennifer.

Jennifer Sherman: Thank you, Ian. Over the last several years, we have put several building blocks in place to fuel the long-term growth of the company. This has included making significant investments in plant expansions, new product development and strategic acquisitions that have expanded our product offerings in geographic footprint. With those pillars in place, we announced on our year-end earnings call that we are expecting 2023 to be another record year for Federal Signal. We are off to a strong start with our Q1 net sales EPS at the highest level in the company’s history for the first quarter of the year. Within our Environmental Solutions Group, an improving supply chain supported higher production levels with increased sales volumes, contributions from recent acquisitions, robust aftermarket demand and strong price realization, we were able to deliver a 16% year-over-year net sales increase and 180 basis point improvement in adjusted EBITDA margin.

During Q1, production at two of our largest manufacturing facilities within ESG improved by 17% compared to the fourth quarter of 2022. This represents the second consecutive quarter of double digit production growth and the teams achieved their highest average daily build rates since Q1 of 2020. This strong execution contributed to a 27% year-over-year increase in street sweeper sales and double digit increases in sales of both sewer cleaners and safe digging trucks. Our aftermarket team also had another strong quarter with overall aftermarket revenues in Q1 this year, up 22% over last year with particularly strong parts sales. To meet growing demand our FS Depot parts business has successfully increased its workforce and during the first quarter had a significant focus on reducing backlog and improving lead times in order to deliver essential parts to our dealers and minimize equipment downtime for our end customers.

In addition to strong organic growth, we are pleased with the contributions from M&A during the first quarter. Ground Force and TowHaul continue to perform in line with our expectations. We also completed the acquisition of Blasters in January and the team is off to a strong start. While we are encouraged by the improving supply chain environment, we are still not out of the woods and there continued to be pockets of supply-related disruptions for certain components, specifically hydraulics and pumps. Given that, we are not yet maximizing our production capacity. Chassis availability also continues to be a constraining factor within our dump body businesses, particularly for our businesses that build on Class 5 chassis. Our Safety and Security Systems Group also delivered impressive results during the quarter, including 19% top line growth and an adjusted EBITDA margin of 19.8%, a 390 basis point improvement compared to last year and towards the high end of the new target range announced on our last earnings call of 18% to 21%.

As Ian mentioned during the quarter, SSG was awarded a large international fleet order for public safety equipment and the team was able to promptly deliver about a third of the equipment during Q1. This order was another success story for the team in penetrating new geographic markets with new product introductions such as the Allegiant and Reliant value line of light bars. In addition, we continue to grow domestic market share and recently secured fleet orders with several new state and local municipality police departments. Overall, sales and public safety equipment in Q1 this year were up $4.5 million or 12% compared to Q1 of last year. With supply chains continuing to ease, we also saw a 35% year-over-year increase in sales of industrial signalling equipment.

Demand remained strong and the team is focused on increasing throughput to reduce lead times. Over the last several years, we have made meaningful investments in organic growth within our SSG business, including purchasing the University Park facility and insourcing production of several key components in order to reduce our reliance on overseas suppliers. For example, during the first quarter of 2022, we launched the in-house production of our MicroPulse line, which leverages automated laser technology. The MicroPulse is a low profile, high performing LED lighting product for both first Reebok responder and work truck vehicles. The line includes production of both new product models and those that were previously outsourced. With the incremental revenues from new product models and lower cost production of previously outsourced models, the MicroPulse production line has improved product margins and generated incremental operating income of approximately $1.5 million in ’22 with further growth projected in 2023.

In addition, we have recently invested in a third printed circuit board manufacturing line at University Park to increase production volumes of public safety equipment, achieve cost savings and reduce reliance on our suppliers, which have been unable to meet our current demand. The new production line is expected to be operational in the third quarter of 2023. We expect the broad acts taken to mitigate component shortages, including investments to in-source production and bring additional suppliers online will provide meaningful long-term benefits to Federal Signal. Demand for our products and our aftermarket offerings remains at unprecedented levels with both our orders and backlog this quarter, again setting new company records. There are several macroeconomic tailwinds contributing to the strong demand, and I’ll highlight a few of the key market trends today.

Within our municipal markets, we are continuing to see benefits from the American Rescue Plan Act, which in 2021 earmarked $350 billion for state, local and territorial governments for a variety of purposes, including the maintenance of essential infrastructure such as sewer systems and streets. In the first quarter, municipal orders were up 11% compared to last year, primarily driven by significant street sweeper demand. We also continue to expect meaningful multi-year tailwinds arising from the $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Act, which has $550 billion earmarked for new investments in roads, bridges, power, water and broadband infrastructure, public transportation and airports. For example, increased demand and spend on broadband infrastructure is generating additional interest and our broad range of safe digging products that can vacuum, excavate and-or convey materials in a safe and efficient manner.

While we typically discuss this public funding source in the context of our ESG product offerings, we are also seeing the benefits within SSG, in particular with higher demand for warning systems. The Infrastructure Act earmarked $6.8 billion for the Federal Emergency Management Agency or FEMA to invest in disaster mitigation programs. This includes $500 million over five years to provide hazard mitigation assistance to local governments through the STORM Act. Typically, FEMA allocates around $50 million annually for tornado flood and fire warning projects, but under the Act funding to FEMA is anticipated to increase by 50% annually over the five year period. To date, we have received hundreds of proposals for communities across the country that are seeking government grants from this funding source to update or expand warning systems and are currently working with two counties that have been awarding grants totalling several million dollars to expand their tornado warning systems.

As part of our warning systems offering, we also provide ongoing maintenance and subscription alerting services, which following the initial sale of the warning equipment, provide for a longer term recurring revenue stream. With higher frequencies of national disasters such as wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods, we are proud that our products play a role in helping to keep communities safe. Electrification remains a key area of investment for the company and during the quarter, we showcased our newest vehicle electrification offerings at large trade shows. Vehicle electrification and other green initiatives are expected to drive demand not only for our EV product offerings, but also from the corresponding increase in long-term demand for lithium batteries.

With the acquisitions of Ground Force and TowHaul, we have created a platform of specialty vehicles that support the extraction of metals and minerals, including lithium. With expectations that global demand for lithium ion battery is many end markets will grow at a CAGR of an approximately 30% over the next 10 years or so, we are energized about the positive growth trajectory in this end market. I now wanted to take a few minutes to provide an update on a couple of our internal initiatives. Our focus on 80/20 improvement is deeply ingrained in our culture and has played and will continue to play a key role in driving our organic growth and industry leading margins. As an example, we recently completed a product line simplification 80/20 initiative for our ox bodies line of dump trucks, where the team was able to analyse the sales history to identify two leading product lines that comprise approximately 90% of its revenues.

The team then identified the most commonly ordered dump body specifications for these product lines, and through this product line simplification process was able to reduce its standard offerings from over 4,200 body combinations to less than 400, achieving a 90% reduction in skews. This 80/20 improvement initiative is expected to result in annual savings of $650,000 at this plant. We recently hired a dedicated resource on the corporate tasks with driving additional throughput improvement projects across many of our businesses. In addition, this resource will play a key role in implementing and publishing our federal signal enterprise operating system. With our continued growth through M&A, this playbook will also support long-term value creation as we continue to standardize and implement lean manufacturing solutions at acquired businesses.

Moving on to aftermarkets, which represented approximately 27% of ESG’s revenues during the quarter, mainly due to the strength and parts sales that I noted earlier. Aftermarket remains a key strategic initiative of ours and we see additional opportunities to grow that business by expanding into new geographies that we believe to be underserved. During Q1, our new facility in Colorado was open and we have already regained a large street sweeper fleet order with a major municipality in the region. This facility will support sales of many of our product lines in the region, including Elgin Vector, TRUVAC and Jet Stream. In addition, as Ian noted, we have made meaningful investments in Q1 to replenish our rental fleet and support the anticipated continuation in high demand for rentals and used equipment.

On the M&A front, we are pleased to announce the closing of the Trackless acquisition in April. Trackless is a leading Canadian manufacturer of multipurpose off-road municipal tractors and a variety of attachments, which provide year-round value to its customers. The Trackless integration is well underway and we are excited about the opportunities to leverage our distribution channel in the US to expand the geographic reach of Trackless products and accelerate the growth trajectory of this business. Our continued growth through disciplined M&A differentiates Federal Signal as an accumulator of leading brands of specialty vehicles and supporting aftermarket offerings. Our deal pipeline remains very active and we continue to expect M&A to be important part of our future growth.

Turning now to our outlook for the rest of the year, demand for our products and our aftermarket offerings remains at unprecedented levels with both our orders and backlog this quarter again, setting new company records. With our first quarter performance, our record backlog, and improving supply chain conditions, we are raising our full year adjusted EPS outlook to a new range of $2.21 to $2.43 from the prior range of $2.15 to $2.40. We are also increasing the low end of our full year net sales outlook range by $40 million, establishing a new range of $1.62 billion to $1.72 billion. At this time, I think we’re ready for questions. Operator,

Operator: Our first question comes from Chris Moore with CJS Securities. Please go ahead.

Chris Moore: Maybe, start with backlog and just maybe your thoughts in terms of the pricing of your backlog today versus six months or 12 months ago, when you factor in things like year date, seal increase, there’s obviously freight costs are changing, some improving. Just, kind of your thoughts on how that backlash sits today from a pricing perspective.

Ian Hudson: Yeah, I think Chris, obviously, last year we took a series of pricing actions in response to the inflationary environment that we saw at that time. So we feel pretty good about the pricing of the backlog. I think if you look at the margin improvement price was a factor in in driving some of that improvement. We also had increased sales volumes and some nice operating leverage both of our within both our groups, but price was a factor. But I think overall where we sit today, Chris, I think we feel comfortable with the pricing of the backlog.

Chris Moore: Got it. Record orders, record backlog, what’s your sense of kind of customer perception regarding lead times? Do they feel, less need at this point in time to pre-order than they might have this time last year?

Jennifer Sherman: Yeah, we looked carefully at the order trends across the business and one of the things that was notable was that we saw or strong orders on both the industrial and municipal side. We still continue to have challenges on the dump body side of the business because of the limited chassis availability, particularly for Class 5 chassis’ and that impact a couple of our businesses. But overall, we’re still expecting strong orders in Q2, although sequential and year-over-year comparisons may be stored kind of given the size of the backlog.

Ian Hudson: And I think Chris, we are actively trying to work down some of those lead times. That’s what one of the things we cited on our prepared comments was just the increased production levels that we’ve seen at both of our Vector and Elgin facilities, and that’s the second quarter in succession where we’ve seen meaningful improvement in production levels and that’s encouraging that we’ve seen some improvement on the supply chain there, but I think overall we are trying to work down some of those lead times.

Jennifer Sherman: Yeah. Just add there we’re very focused on trucks per day and kind of building on what Ian had said. We saw 17% sequential improvement and we were really encouraged at our largest facility. If you just look at that particular facility, we saw 22% sequential improvement. So, very focused on reducing the lead times, but encouraged by the order trends we’re seeing.

Chris Moore: Got it. That’s very helpful. I’ll leave it there. Thanks guys.

Operator: Our next question comes from Mike Shlisky with D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead.

Michael Shlisky: Hey, good morning and thanks for taking my question. Actually, I actually one o’clock on your last answer, or maybe it was two questions ago about the chassis comment for dump bodies, could you had mentioned, Ian, your prepared comments that you had a chassis headwind in the quarter and it sounded like it was a headwind that implied a positive mix for dump bodies. In other words, having more chassis is positive for the dump body business I would imagine. So can you square those two up? Did you have better chassis supply in this quarter or worse?

Ian Hudson: So two separate — when we talk about chassis might two separate kind of groups I would say is that we never provide the chassis for the dump truck business. The customer always provides the chassis. In the prepared comments, what we were talking about was the other side of the business where historically we’ve had about a 50-50 split where, 50% of the time we provide the chassis, 50% of the time the customer provides the chassis. In the last couple of — last year or two, we’ve actually increased the amount of chassis that we supply because we’ve had pretty decent access to chassis and so we’ve been able to provide those to our customers. We’ve made some strategic investments in procuring chassis on behalf of our customers, but what that means from a margin standpoint is we don’t make much of margin on those chassis.

It’s more of a pass through. So that has, as we increase the chassis revenue that can be a drag on gross margin and EBITDA and that was what we cited on a prepared comments that year-over-year, the increase in the chassis revenue where we are supplying more of the chassis that caused a headwind year over year, about 40 basis points on EBITDA margin. So it’s not necessarily linked to the dumb body business.

Michael Shlisky: Okay. So it’s just mix that’s really.

Ian Hudson: Correct.

Michael Shlisky: All of it.

Ian Hudson: Mix with more chassis revenue for more chassis that we provide.

Michael Shlisky: Perfect. Thank you.

Jennifer Sherman: A different way, the business, our chassis revenue was up $12 million year-over-year and that had as Ian pointed out a drag.

Michael Shlisky: Got it. My next question, I can ask this two different ways. I’ll just pick one. The SSG margins were very strong. That’s really solid. And it’s already towards the high another range you just put out few months ago. So are you already thinking about maybe even an additional range higher from here? Even what you learned? Or I guess what could — what could go wrong from here in that segment and not go towards the high end of the range that you just put out in the foreseeable future?

Jennifer Sherman: Look, we are really encouraged by SSG’s performance and as we’ve talked about on previous calls, they were a couple quarters ahead. We’ve seen in kind of supply chain improvement. I spent some time on the call talking about some of the insourcing that we’ve done, which has made a difference out there. And they also had a large fleet order which helped them during the quarter and we’re confident that they’ll continue to operate within that range and can fluctuate quarter to quarter, but we’re really encouraged by what we saw in Q1.

Michael Shlisky: Okay. Fair enough. And, maybe one last one for me, just wanted to ask about the dealer network. Given the higher interest rates we’re seeing out there for floor plan or inventory type lending, or even just lending in general, are any of your dealers experiencing any challenges finding adequate financing at decent rates? And is that affecting anyone’s inventory decisions? And then maybe secondly, are there any dealerships that are potentially experiencing financial distress at the moment?

Jennifer Sherman: Yeah, a couple things. One is we have several large dealers that are very well financed and very well capitalized. In addition to that, given the amount of public funding that’s available for our products that’s been a positive tailwind. And the short answer to your question is we really haven’t seen any issues with respect to our dealer network and we monitor it closely. We’re very fortunate to have well financed dealers.

Michael Shlisky: Outstanding. I’ll leave it there. Thank you so much.

Operator: Our next question comes from Felix Boeschen with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Felix Boeschen: Hey, I appreciate the comments on the 17% sequential improvement in output at two biggest facilities, but I did note that ESG sales were down just a big quarter over quarter. Can you maybe square that away for us? Just sort of what worked against you and maybe if you could also comment just how much the production for in-house rental equipment might have impacted revenue or EBIT with an ESG.

Ian Hudson: So, Felix, you’re talking sequentially?

Felix Boeschen: Yes,

Ian Hudson: Yeah, so, I think aftermarket was a piece of that. There is less aftermarket business in Q4 than that, sorry, in Q1 versus Q4. The other piece would be, as you pointed to was just the production of the units in the rental fleet. We added about I think it was about $18 million gross into the rental fleet during Q1. We wouldn’t have been in putting any of that really in the fleet during Q4. So that’s probably the biggest factor. We also had a bit of a step down at TBI with the chassis supply situation. So versus Q4, that was down a little bit in Q1.

Felix Boeschen: Got it. Super helpful. And then h how do you feel about the rental size today, just relative to the opportunities you’re expecting sort of into the back half of the year and presumably into 2024

Jennifer Sherman: Given the lead times that we’re experiencing, rental demand continues to be strong. Also we’re seeing several contractors, as they bid and execute on some of these public funding through the Infrastructure Act, supplement their fleets through rental. So we’re very encouraged by what we’re seeing.

Felix Boeschen: Got it. And then just maybe if I could, my last one, but Jennifer, if you don’t mind giving some more color around maybe specific vehicle vocations. I’m curious how orders in TBI is holding up versus maybe some of their municipal centric locations?

Jennifer Sherman: Yeah. We focused on OX bodies and we gave the example in terms of what the A-20 improvement initiative could do, and that’s a good example of where — they’re sitting on record backlogs. In addition to that, where we’re seeing some softness is really on the Class 5 chassis side of things. So two of our businesses are reliant on Class 5 chassis, and those are down year-over-year. That’s where we’ve seen some softness across the rest of the enterprise. Excuse me, on the dump body side of things we’re seeing various puts and takes depending on what chassis availability is.

Ian Hudson: Yeah. And, I think Felix, if you look at kind of the breakdown, municipal was up 11% year-over-year. That’s, a lot of that is driven by strength and street sweeper orders, which is tied to some of the funding as Jennifer mentioned, the American Rescue Plan Act. Yeah, I think we talked about the fact that Q1 of last year was the prior record in terms of the highest orders. So even when we are exiting Q1 of this year to Q1 of last year, that was a pretty — it’s pretty strong comp. But even with all of that, we didn’t see a major drop off year-over-year in any product lines. The largest product line was down year-over-year was probably the down touch, which was down about $11 million year-over-year in terms of orders and that’s about 15%, but even with that order intake, it was still at a pretty good level.

Felix Boeschen: Got it. Really appreciate the time.

Operator: Our next question comes from Steve Barger with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Steve Barger: As I think about your focus on trucks per day, your guidance increase and your existing capacity, presumably this will be the low quarter for ESG revenue, but I’m wondering, do you expect that revenue will be fairly level quarter to quarter for the rest of the year as you build to these really strong demand levels?

Ian Hudson: Yeah, Steve, I think we’ll see in Q2 and Q3, those tend to be strongly like because of the aftermarket business, which we would expect that to pick up. So I think we’d expect Q3 to be our highest for the year in terms of both revenue and EPS and that’s primarily driven by the strength in the aftermarket business because you have three solid months of a lot of activities. So I think our cadence would be, to your point, Q1 we would expect to be the lowest. Then we’d see a step up in Q2 and then Q3 we’d expect that to be the high point. And then, Q4 is always relatively strong, but we would expect Q3 to be kind of the highest quarter of the year,

Steve Barger: But presumably you wouldn’t expect to see a significant drop off in Q4 just even as aftermarket goes away. But if supply chain has improved given your backlog, you’d be running at high capacity, right.

Ian Hudson: Yeah, agreed. Yeah.

Steve Barger: Okay. Your, your M&A strategy has obviously been focused on bolt on deals, surveying good niches. As you think about the funding environment and the visibility out there, is that driving deal multiples higher? And are you changing how you think about multiples? What looks reasonable just given how you see growth and your ability to leverage the dealer network?

Jennifer Sherman: It all depends on the synergy numbers and we’re pretty conservative when we developed those numbers, but again, we’ve seen multiples actually come down over the last year. I think a combination of the pandemic and supply chain challenges, particularly in the markets, the primary transactions we’re looking at, we’ve seen more reasonable market multiples. And we’ve also, candidly we talked about in the last call, we have a number of sellers that have come to us and said, we want to sell to Federal Signal, which we’ve developed a pretty good reputation in the marketplace as being a preferred buyer.

Steve Barger: Okay. Good. And then last quarter you talked a bit about higher the normal investment in the lease fleet and allocating the production capacity to that. With demand this strong, are you more inclined to keep third party customers happy or to make that lease fleet investment? Or how are you going to balance that as supply chain improves and you work to reduce lead times?

Ian Hudson: Yeah, I think Steve, the heavy investment for the year was really doing Q1 and their reasons for that is really you want to have the units added to the rental fleet come, April, May time, just when the season kind of starts picking up. So I think the heavy sense of production was during Q1, and that’s one of the factors why Q1 is our lowest in terms of revenue and EPS. So, there may be some incremental investment as we go throughout the course of the year, but I think Q1 is when the bulk of that takes place.

Jennifer Sherman: And we’re very we’re very focused on reducing those lead times with increasing unit production.

Steve Barger: Right. Yeah. And that generates, obviously better revenue, but also good operating leverages as you, offset the absorption.

Jennifer Sherman: Volume matters.

Operator: Our next question comes from Walter Liptak with Seaport Partners. Please go ahead.

Walter Liptak: Hi, thanks. Good morning guys and congrats for the next quarter. I wanted to ask first about the SKU reduction at body was really interesting and it’s great to see just to hear the stories about 80/20 work that’s happening. But the question I have is about is this an initiative that’s been ongoing and you just decided to call this one out? Or is there more of an effort to bring 80/20 to some of the newly acquired businesses?

Jennifer Sherman: Yeah, a couple things, Welt, this was just one example of many and our OX team has done, such a good job and what I really was trying to message is we come out of this pandemic supply chain, our teams, there’s a refocused effort on 80/20 across the enterprise. And I think what’s important also to note is it’s such a part of our culture that we’ve hired a dedicated individual as part of the corporate team now that is working with each of these businesses on these 80/20 type projects and so we believe that will be a driving factor in our margin improvement as we go forward.

Walter Liptak: That’s great. Good to hear. I want to do a follow up on the selling prices and inflation and I wondered, are you seeing there’s kind of a mix out there of some inflation and some material costs coming down. So I wonder if you could just comment on, where you’re seeing inflation in 2023 and where are selling prices going? Are you able to get price kind of across the board or are there some products that were — pricing is a little bit more difficult?

Jennifer Sherman: Yeah, we’ve seen like many companies, wage inflation, in addition to that steel, we’ve seen that come down some depending on the type of steel that you’re talking about. But, that kind of can vary month to month. We have a large percentage as we’ve talked about before of our steel fixed as we move forward price that is something that it depends business to business and each one of our businesses monitor and market conditions, we’ve been successful at price increases across the businesses as reflected in the numbers.

Walter Liptak: Okay, great and then maybe a last one you, just another follow up. You commented that some of the multiples are a little bit lower and I wondered if you had a thought about why it’s great that some multiples are coming down and I wonder if you have a thought about why is that are there more private equity funds that are liquidating to raise capital? Why do you think multiples are coming lower?

Jennifer Sherman: I think the interest expense and the impact interest rates have on private equities models plays an important role in the types of transactions that we’re looking at. In addition to that as we’ve talked about before, as we do more and more acquisitions, we’ve become more of a preferred buyer. And with many of our transactions, it’s not all about price. It’s about much more than price. And I think that I’m proud of the reputation that our teams have developed with respect to M&A and the execution integration. And I think that will benefit us long term, as we’ve seen in some of the transactions that we’ve usually done. Trackless is a great example.

Walter Liptak: Okay. That sounds great. Thanks very much.

Operator: Our next question comes from Dave Storms with Stonegate Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

David Storms: Thank you and good morning. With regards to the production improvements that you’ve mentioned a lot can you break that out in terms of, is that driven by supply chain improvements? Is that driven by the operational improvements through the 80/20 initiative that you’ve talked about and how much runway do you see left there?

Jennifer Sherman: We’ve seen obviously some supply chain improvements, and that’s been a critical driver. We’ve also, the teams are, there’s been a refocus as I mentioned earlier is we’ve gotten out of the nightmare of pandemic and supply chain on our 80/20 initiative. So we’ve seen benefits of that at various businesses across the enterprise. We continue to believe, we’re kind of back to, as we talked about it, our businesses were back to that kind of Q1 of 2020 type unit production levels at a couple of our businesses. But, there’s still room for more. We did invested in our expansion of our largest facility and we still believe there’s more opportunity for margin expansion as supply chain improves and we’re excited about those opportunities.

David Storms: Very helpful, thank you. And then Ian you mentioned an increased demand in rentals. They are expected through the rest of the year. Do you see this coming as at the expense of sales or in concert with grown sales? And then also any relation that has to any aftermarket sales through the rest of 2023?

Ian Hudson: Yeah, no, I think we we’re expecting strong demand for all of our product offerings. I think if you look at the contribution of aftermarket, it was about 27% in of ESGs revenues in Q1. That was about the same level as Q1 of last year and also for the whole of last year. So I think our growth, on the new equipment side, has been keeping pace with the growth that we’ve seen in aftermarket. That’s what we’d expect. And I think with lead times where they’re at I think having the offerings that we have where we can offer used equipment, sales and rentals, that positions us really well to serve our customers. So, I think as we think about the potential for the infrastructure bill and the various projects, having the ability to sell new, to provide rentals to sell used, I think that positions us really well.

David Storms: That’s very helpful. Thank you.

Operator: This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference over to Jennifer Sherman, Chief Executive Officer for any closing remarks.

Jennifer Sherman: In closing, I’d like to reiterate that we are confident in the long-term prospects for our businesses and our markets. Our foundation is strong and we are focused on delivering profitable long-term growth through the execution of our strategic initiatives. We would like to express our thanks to our stockholders, employees, distributors, dealers and customers for their continued support. Thank you for joining us today, and we’ll talk to you soon.

Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.