Title

Presentation

Operator: Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the APA Conference Call. . Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Gary Clark, Vice President of Investor Relations.

Gary Clark: Good morning, and thank you for joining us on APA Corporation’s First Quarter 2023 Financial and Operational Results Conference Call. We will begin the call with an overview by CEO and President, John Christmann. Steve Riney, Executive Vice President and CFO, will then provide further color on our results and outlook. Also on the call and available to answer questions are Dave Pursell, Executive Vice President of Development; Tracey Henderson, Executive Vice President of Exploration; and Clay Bretches, Executive Vice President of Operations. Our prepared remarks will be approximately 12 minutes in length with the remainder of the hour allotted for Q&A. In conjunction with yesterday’s press release, I hope you have had the opportunity to review our first quarter financial and operational supplement, which can be found on our Investor Relations website at investor.apacorp.com.

Please note that we may discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the supplemental information provided on our website. Consistent with previous reporting practices, adjusted production numbers cited in today’s call are adjusted to exclude noncontrolling interest in Egypt and Egypt tax barrels. I’d like to remind everyone that today’s discussion will contain forward-looking estimates and assumptions based on our current views and reasonable expectations. However, a number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from what we discuss today. A full disclaimer is located with the supplemental information on our website.

And with that, I will turn the call over to John.

John Christmann: Good morning, and thank you for joining us. On today’s call, we will review our first quarter highlights, update our operational progress and comment on our outlook for the remainder of the year. For the last several years, we have been navigating a volatile price environment, and this has been amplified recently with the ups and downs of global oil prices, extreme moves in global LNG pricing and the rapid decline in U.S. natural gas prices. Despite this volatility, we are constructive on long-term prices for oil, natural gas and LNG. Based on this fundamental belief, we plan to invest over the long term for sustainable low single-digit production growth at attractive returns. That said, we cannot ignore price volatility and will, therefore, seek to moderate our investment plans during periods of significant price weakness.

We must also be responsive to changing governmental tax and regulatory regimes within our countries of operations. Fortunately, our diversified portfolio provides us optionality, and we maintain the flexibility to adjust our investment plans relatively quickly. In 2023, we have demonstrated this by reducing natural gas directed activity and even curtailing production in response to extreme Waha price dislocations. We also made the decision to reduce spending in the North Sea as the recently enacted energy profits levy has resulted in less competitive return opportunities than in the U.S. and Egypt. So while you should generally expect us to invest at a steady pace for long-term returns and moderate growth, you will also see periods where we respond to external influences by adjusting or redirecting capital activity.

Turning now to our first quarter results, which are characterized by strong operational performance and good cost control. APA met or exceeded production guidance in each of our 3 regions. Total adjusted production was 4,000 BOEs per day, above the top end of our guidance range. Adjusted oil production also exceeded expectations, led by performance in the Permian and the North Sea. Capital investment during the period was slightly below guidance, and our average operating drilling rig count remained steady in the quarter with 17 in Egypt, 5 in the Permian Basin and 1 semisubmersible in the North Sea. In the U.S., we connected 17 new wells, and as planned, most of these went online in the back half of the quarter. While timing of well connections can drive production variances, on a quarter-to-quarter basis, we are continuing to see significant benefits from the steady pace of our drilling program.

As expected, first quarter oil production declined sequentially from the fourth quarter. However, we remain on track to deliver a significant uptick in the second and third quarters. Permian activity this year will be concentrated primarily on oil development in the Southern Midland Basin and oil-weighted development in the Delaware Basin. At Alpine High, we are currently testing a new 3-well pad at a constrained rate. Beyond this, we are ramping down our planed 2023 lean gas drilling activity in the Permian due to the prevailing weakness in Waha natural gas prices. This will result in an upstream capital reduction of approximately $100 million but should have no material impact on our full year U.S. production guidance. We are pleased with the results at Alpine High and will return when Waha prices improve.

In Egypt, gross oil production increased by approximately 1,200 barrels per day compared to the fourth quarter. New well connections, recompletion activity and exploration success were all consistent with our expectations, and we are beginning to see positive contribution from our higher activity pace. For the second quarter, however, we are forecasting that Egypt gross volumes will be roughly unchanged as we have recently experienced some production disruptions, most of which are temporary. Despite this, our full year Egypt production guidance has not changed. Turning now to the North Sea. Our production exceeded expectations in the first quarter, driven by strong facility operating efficiency. We are projecting second quarter average daily production will be in line to slightly below the first quarter as scheduled platform maintenance and expected return to more normalized facility operating efficiency will be mostly offset by contribution from a new well, which was placed online in late March.

In Suriname, we continue to progress toward an oil hub development project with activity in the first half of 2023 focused on appraising Krabdagu. We have completed the flow test on the first appraisal well and are currently in the pressure buildup phase. Results of this well thus far are in line with expectations. The second Krabdagu appraisal well is currently drilling and we’ll provide more information on next steps in the future. On the ESG front, we delivered another excellent quarter of safety performance and are making good progress toward our longer-term emissions goal of implementing projects to eliminate 1 million tons of CO2 equivalent emissions by year-end 2024. We reduced routine upstream flaring in Egypt by 40% last year, which gave us an excellent start on this goal.

In 2023, we plan to further reduce flaring in Egypt and focus on converting diesel combustion for power generation to field gas, which will reduce both cost and net emissions. In closing, APA has the portfolio and the operational flexibility to respond quickly to near-term commodity price volatility, and we are managing our capital activity accordingly. We remain committed to returning a minimum of 60% of our free cash flow to shareholders this year via dividends and share repurchases. Longer term, despite many cross currents, we believe the investment case for APA and the E&P industry is strong, and the outlook for hydrocarbon prices and fundamentals is very constructive. And with that, I will turn the call over to Steve Riney.

Stephen Riney: Thanks, John. For the first quarter, under generally accepted accounting principles, APA reported consolidated net income of $242 million or $0.78 per diluted common share. As usual, these results include items that are outside of core earnings. The most significant of these items was a $174 million charge related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax liability in the U.K. caused by the most recent increase in the energy profits levy. This was partially offset by the release of a valuation allowance on U.S. deferred tax assets. Excluding these and other smaller items, adjusted net income for the first quarter was $372 million or $1.19 per diluted common share. Free cash flow, as we define it, which excludes changes in working capital, was $272 million in the quarter, 81% of which we returned to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.

As John noted, it was a strong quarter for production, and costs were a good bit under plan. G&A expense was $65 million, significantly below both the prior quarter and the same quarter last year. This is a result of APA’s lower stock price at quarter end and the mark-to-market impact on previously accrued share-based compensation. Excluding this mark-to-market impact, underlying quarterly G&A costs remained stable at roughly $100 million. LOE also came in a good bit below expectations primarily due to the previously mentioned mark-to-market impact of stock-based compensation programs as well as foreign currency impacts in Egypt. Switching to forward-looking guidance items. In the U.S., oil production growth is expected to return in the second quarter and should ramp further in the third quarter in conjunction with completion cadence.

Our U.S. natural gas production outlook is more muted as we are responding to weak Waha pricing with lean gas drilling reductions. In addition, we could see further lean gas production curtailments. But to be clear, further curtailments are not contemplated in our U.S. production guidance. All of this is consistent with our bias towards managing for cash flow and long-term returns, not production growth. The $100 million reduced drilling activity John noted will occur mostly in the second half of this year. With that, our full year capital budget has been reduced to $1.9 billion to $2 billion. Next, I would like to highlight our 2 material gas trading activities that are truly differential for APA, our gas transport obligations and our Cheniere gas supply contract.

Our gas transport contracts provide significant cash flow benefits during periods of dislocated Permian gas prices. We hold just over 670 million cubic feet per day of Permian Basin takeaway capacity. We purchased third-party gas in-basin for resale on the Gulf Coast, realizing a trading margin whenever the price differentials are greater than the transport cost. In the first quarter, this activity generated a net profit of $23 million. Based on current strip prices, we have increased our full year guidance for net profit from such activity to $100 million. The Cheniere agreement, which will commence on August 1, is another important commercial trading activity. This arrangement provides upside exposure to world LNG margins over Houston Ship Channel on 140 million cubic feet of natural gas per day.

For 2023, projected cash flow from this contract has come down a bit from our prior guidance due to the decline in European and Asian LNG prices. Over the past few months, we have provided potential outcomes of annualized free cash flows at different price levels related to this contract. You can find those in the appendix of our financial and operational supplement. At current strip prices, the Cheniere contract will generate and expected $175 million of free cash flow for the last 5 months of 2023. All of our guidance for both the second quarter and updated full year 2023 and can be found in our financial and operational supplement. One final item I’d draw your attention to. Looking at the balance sheet, you will notice that our revolver debt increased by a little over $400 million in the first quarter.

This was driven by an approximate $500 million increase in working capital primarily due to the paydown of accrued liabilities from December 31, but it also includes increasing accounts receivable in Egypt. Overall, we had a very good quarter to start the year. We’re benefiting from relatively stable activity levels within a portfolio that allows us to generate free cash flow and invest in the long-term sustainability of our business. And with that, I will turn the call over to the operator for Q&A.

Operator: . Our first question comes from John Freeman of Raymond James.

John Freeman: I believe the original plan was after the 3-well pad gap brought on in Alpine High in the first quarter, there was going to be those kind of a break and then there was going to be 5 additional wells that we’re going to come out at the end of the year. So is the $100 million reduction in the budget basically just coming from the removal of those 5 Alpine High wells? Or is there more to it?

David Pursell: Yes, John. This is Dave Pursell. We may have had more than 5 wells planned for the middle of the year. But if you’re trying to — there’s some moving parts in the Permian budget, but the effect is, yes, the net $100 million is essentially all the Alpine drilling, completion and facilities capital rounds up to $100 million.

John Freeman: Perfect. And then just my follow-up question. I know at some point, there was some discussions about kind of following the release of the Ocean Patriot next month that there was going to be some use of that kind of freed up comp or it might have been to add an additional rig in the Permian. I’m just — I guess, first of all, is that — would that be the case? If you were going to increase activity anywhere in the portfolio, is that likely where it would go? And sort of what commodity environment would you likely need to see to potentially add another rig in the Permian at some point in the future?

John Christmann: Well, John, I mean, we did add some more weighted drilling in the Permian with that. That was contemplated. And then you’re seeing us drop some of the gas weighted drilling at Alpine. So two effects there.

Operator: Our next Question. Our next question comes from Doug Leggate, Bank of America.

Doug Leggate: Sorry, guys, can you hear me now?

John Christmann: Can be.

Doug Leggate: All right. Sorry about that. I’m sitting in an airport. I have my new boss in on. I apologize, John. My first question is for Steve, actually. Steve, I wonder if you could just elaborate a little bit on your comments about the increase in receivables in Egypt. There’s obviously, I think, some concern events over there, the devaluation and so on might have an impact on your ability to get cash out of the country. So I’m just going to hit that right upfront and ask if you can walk us through what you’re seeing currently and whether that working capital build is in fact reversible.

Stephen Riney: Yes, Doug, let me just start with the working capital level, and we’ll work into the Egypt receivables impact on working capital. So we — I said in my prepared remarks that we’ve got about a $500 million increase in working capital in the first quarter, $300 million of that was a decrease in accrued compensation and benefits. So as you might imagine, through the year, we accrue primarily incentive compensation, both short term and long term. And we accrue that through the year. We do that every year, and then we pay it off in the first quarter of the following year. And so that’s exactly what happened. That was a — we do that every year. It was a little bit larger going from the end ’22 accrued liability to what was paid off in 2023 because of the performance, number one, but also because of the share price because it does include the long-term incentive comp, which is share price-based.

And because of — it’s a 3 years of programs and because the share price had improved over those years, that raised the cost of that. So that’s $300 million of the $500 million. There was another $100 million decrease in general accounts payable, stuff for operating expense and capital expenditures, things like that. And so that’s $400 million out of the $500 million increase in working capital. And all of those things are very common as we go from fourth quarter of 1 year to the first quarter of the next. Now there were a number of other small, mostly kind of $50 million and smaller items moving in and out of working capital. And that includes a $50 million increase in accounts receivable. And again, I’ve provided this in my prepared remarks.

Just to be completely transparent with folks because I know there’s probably some amount of concern over what’s going on in Egypt. So in the spirit of transparency, I indicated that accounts receivable in Egypt had increased $180 million. If you look at our supplement, you’ll see a working capital increase for Egypt of $224 million. That includes a number of other things like inventory and stuff like that. So $180 million in Egypt. And I don’t know, John, you want to kind of on Egypt?

John Christmann: On Egypt, just a couple of minutes here, Doug. One, we’ve been in the country for more than — almost 30 years and we’ve partnered with Egypt and EGPC and the highest levels of government the whole time. I’d say over that time period, Egypt has been through a number of challenges and successful reforms. The best thing that we can do to help Egypt and our stakeholders is to deliver oil production growth. And that’s what we’re doing while reducing our emissions. Egypt, like many other places in the world today, is going through a challenging economic time with inflation. This does have some flow-through to us, but not anything that we haven’t had to work through in the past. And in fact, there’s been more difficult times in the past.

Specifically, they are dealing with the after effects of a currency devaluation in January, and we are currently helping our Egyptian National employees through this as we have also done in the past. We maintain very deep and long-standing relationships with our Egyptian stakeholders, both at EGPC and within the government at the highest levels, I’ll say. And we are confident that they will work through this. And we are also having very constructive conversations on how to address the receivables over time currently. So we feel good and a long track record here.

Stephen Riney: Yes. And Doug, if I could just kind of add to John’s comments there a bit. So we are — it did go up $180 million in the first quarter. And I’d say that the receivables we have from Egypt are higher than historical averages, no doubt. Some of that is price and some of it is the delay in payment. But I’d just comment that, as John talked about the 30 years of history, we’ve been in this position several times. This level of receivables from Egypt is not unprecedented. It’s never a good time to have this happen, obviously. But I would say it’s not overly concerning at this point. Egypt’s credit rating has been pretty stable since it got upgraded in 2015. We watch the situation extremely closely. And as John said, we’re in active conversations about this specific issue, and we’re doing that at the very highest levels in the country. So we feel confident about this.

Doug Leggate: Just to be clear, guys, always that balance you talked about in receivables. Are you able to get cash out of the country? Or was that an accumulation of — basically because it’s the highest free cash flowing asset in your portfolio currently? Is this — are you able to get cash out of the country currently?

Stephen Riney: Yes. We are still able to get cash out of the country. That’s not the problem.

Doug Leggate: Okay. My follow-up is, John, there are a few teasers in the deck about the status of Suriname moving towards potential hub development, I think it was the expression — and you said you’ve got the results of at least the first appraisal well at Krabdagu. I wonder if I could ask a question like this. You said the result is in line with expectations. So what were the expectations? And what would you need to move forward by way of resource upside to the more than 800 that you identified in the deck today?

John Christmann: I would just say, Doug, we’re still getting results from Krabdagu. We’re in the buildup phase. To put things in perspective, I won’t — I’m not going to give you a predrill expectations, but the well was in line. But I will remind you that the Krabdagu 2 is 4.9 kilometers from the discovery well. So — and Krabdagu 3 is 10.3 kilometers from the discovery well. So when you look at that map, sometimes you forget just how large of an area that is. And obviously, we’re very pleased with the early data and the results we have from the appraisal well. But you know our history has been able to come back with connected volumes, and we’re not ready to do that yet because we’re still collecting pressure data.

Operator: Our next question comes from Bob Brackett at Bernstein Research.

Robert Brackett: I’ll stick on the Egypt topic. One is just to refresh my memory that in Egypt, natural gas flows domestically sort of toward the Cairo Basin area, whereas oil tends to flow north and you export it and capture those revenues. Am I remembering that correctly? .

John Christmann: Yes.

Robert Brackett: Okay. The follow-up would be, you mentioned that to expect Egypt to be flattish 2Q versus 1Q. You mentioned production disruptions, some of which are temporary. Am I being too much of a lawyer to suggest that some of those are not temporary? And could you maybe give some color in terms of the cadence of getting oilier through the year? You’ve guided 60% oil for Q1 rising towards 64% for a full year average?

John Christmann: Yes. Bob, I’d say the first thing is, you know we’ve got a very large asset base area that stretches really from Cairo, almost to be. And we’ve got a number of fields, and I’ll let Dave walk through some of the temporary things and then another minor issue.

David Pursell: Yes. So counselor, when we think about this, — the capital program is performing as expected. So new wells and recompletes, those are on track. We’ve had slightly lower base production. So a series of things, and we’ll highlight a couple of the big ones. We have an unplanned downtime at a gas plant, which will impact condensate production. We’ve had some ESP failures on some of our larger oil producers. Those are the temporary issues — we’ve done some injection conversions taking producers to waterflood injection and that takes some time to see the oil production benefit from those. And then one of our mature fields, our field experienced an increase in water cut late first quarter. And put that in perspective, it’s a 3,000 barrel a day field that’s now producing close to 1,000 barrels a day.

So it’s not a big producer, but on the margin, that loss of 2,000 barrels a day impacted second quarter. It actually had a slight impact on the first quarter as well. So when we look at the second quarter, we just felt like given those events, it was probably appropriate to guide conservatively flat I’ll tell you, the team is expecting to beat that. So we’ll see, but we want to guide conservatively and we’ll see as we go through the quarter some of the temporary issues will get back. I think it’s important to highlight given the pace of new well drills, the quality of those wells, the recompletes, we remain confident in our ability to grow production in the back half of the year. So no change to guidance for ’23.

Operator: Our next question comes from Charles Meade at Johnson Rice.

Charles Meade: John, I wondered if we could talk a little bit about the time line for these — the Krabdagu appraisal wells. And maybe I was — maybe I was off on the wrong track, but I thought we were going to get the — some of these appraisal results a little earlier. But I found myself wondering maybe these wells, you’ve designed them to be eventual producers, and so they took longer to drill. So could you comment on, I guess, both of those things, what the time line is and whether the current time line is — fits with what you expected and whether these are going to be producers and when you think you’ll be in a position to share that connected volume investment.

John Christmann: Yes, Charles, I don’t know where you got any ideas on time line because it wouldn’t have been from us, but just because Total is operating. I would say the Krabdagu 2 moved on pretty much as expected. We’re just in a period now where we’re gaining data through the buildup. And so that is the most important information in terms of connected volumes. I will say the Krabdagu 3 well is running a little behind, but that also was a brand-new rig that was brought in the basin. And so there’s been some fits and starts on the drilling of the third well. So I wouldn’t read too much into that other than it just is taking a little longer than anticipated.

Charles Meade: Okay. And then going back to U.S. onshore in natural gas specifically, I want to commend to you guys before turning the dial back on that. It’s — I know it may be — sometimes seems easier to do from seats like mine than the actual reality ever for you guys. But if we — to your comments about being bullish on the longer-term outlook for natural gas, what — can you give us a sense of what kind of price or what — or how long at a certain price you would need to see natural gas before you would want to turn the dial back up on U.S. lean gas activity?

John Christmann: As we said in the prepared remarks, we’re seeing good results on the program there. There’s no reason to invest the capital today into this price environment. And so I think we want to see the infrastructure kind of get resolving it through this and feel like we’re in a good place because we’re making long-term investment decisions here. I’m very pleased with the results but we want a clear pathway on a more constructive price environment for gas.

Stephen Riney: Yes. And — if I can just remind people also, John, we sell all of our gas produced in the Permian Basin in the Permian Basin. And so we’re getting Waha or El Paso Permian prices for that gas. And we have our transport obligations to the Gulf Coast, but we buy gas and sell that on the Gulf Coast. We make that margin regardless of whether we produce a molecule of gas in the Permian or not. So everything has to be evaluated on the basis of we’re selling this at Waha, not at the Gulf Coast.

Charles Meade: Right. But no — nothing you’re prepared to share about what Waha needs to be for some duration before you decide to put dollars back there?

Stephen Riney: Well, I think the simple thing would be to say that Waha has to be attractive enough to compete with more oil drilling right next door.

Operator: Our next question comes from Paul Cheng at Scotiabank.

Paul Cheng: Gentlemen, can we go back into Permian? It seems that you’re going to maintain 5 rigs and you’re not going to do additional well in Alpine High. Should we assume in the second half, the number of wells you’re going to bring on in the Permian is going to be higher than what you previously assumed? I think previously, based on your fourth quarter presentation, it looks like we may be talking about 22 wells in the third quarter and 10 wells in the fall. Should we assume it’s going to be higher? Also then, in the second quarter, with 21 well, we thought the production will be higher than what you saw here. Is it the timing of the well coming on stream? Is winning in the — in the quarter?

John Christmann: Yes, Paul, I’ll let Dave jump in. But it is timing. We said most of the wells came on late in the first quarter in the Permian. And then effectively, your well counts are going to be pretty similar because we’re dropping the gas-weighted drilling in the Permian, and we’re adding some oil weighting. So it shouldn’t have a big impact on the numbers, I wouldn’t believe. But Dave, I’ll let you…

David Pursell: Yes. In calendar year ’23, it won’t have a big number. The numbers we’re looking at are a little bit higher than what you have, Paul, but not materially. And I think when you look at the 21 wells in the second quarter, they’re big pads, and those pads come online. The Delaware pad, for example, is 11 wells on our Titus acquisition. And so we’ll be bringing that online. It will come on at pace, but back-end weighted towards the end of the quarter, not the beginning.

Paul Cheng: Okay. And on the second question, the gross production for Egypt, can you just remind us then what is your full year expectation now? And also over the next several years, what kind of budget and what kind of growth rate that you have in mind on the gross production for that?

David Pursell: Yes. Paul, we had talked about 10% exit to exit on gross in Egypt, and the goal would be to, in the next couple of years, think about something in that range.

Paul Cheng: And what’s the risk — what’s the biggest risk that you will not be able to achieve that for this year?

David Pursell: For this year?

Paul Cheng: Yes. certainly the first quarter second quarter is definitely, I suppose that is below what you’ve been looking at. And so you need to step up. And some of the challenge seems it’s going to totally go away. So I mean, how big is the cushion when you’re talking about 10% year-over-year exit rate?

David Pursell: Yes. I think for us, Paul, we have pretty good visibility on — we have really good visibility on the program, and that program consists of new well drilling as well as recompletions. And both of those have a significant impact on the ability to grow production. So we have — again, we still have confidence in our ability to hit that growth rate.

Paul Cheng: And do you have a budget that you can share for the next several years, we need to related to Egypt to achieve that plan?

David Pursell: We haven’t shared that yet, Paul.

Operator: Our next question comes from Neal Dingmann at Truist Securities.

Neal Dingmann: John, my first question is on capital discipline, specifically. Really just in broad strokes, wondering how you all think about managed . Is this more to insure you’re generating sort of a cash flow in a bottle tape like we’re in? Or do you think more about — maybe ensure that you do not complete any wells that won’t be high return threshold?

John Christmann: I mean you’re cutting out a little bit on the question. So I didn’t — I think I — it’s about capital discipline. I’d say, I think, in general we feel good about where we are. Most of our capital costs are under contract. So it’s about cost control and execution. We’ve made some choices to move some things around and you’re seeing the impacts of those. And that’s some of the flexibility of the portfolio. But everything is within line and really, we don’t plan to drill wells that we wouldn’t want to complete. And that’s why you see us kind of curtailing the drilling in the gas-weighted programs in the U.S.

Neal Dingmann: Great details. And then my second, just on OFS inflation. We’ve heard a number of people talk about domestic softness. Just wondering if you’ve seen the something some of your international areas.

John Christmann: I would just say it’s early, right? Everything is still under contract. I think where you’d start to see that as we start looking at, thinking about the ’24 pricing and so forth, as you start pricing that in towards the middle of the year into next year. But right now, as you know, the cost structure always lags. And so we haven’t seen any real direct softness today.

Operator: Our next question comes from Arun Jayaram at JPMorgan Securities.

Arun Jayaram: Maybe, Steve, I want to ask you a little bit about the working capital build in the quarter in Egypt in the U.S. and just thoughts on the drivers of that. And would you expect that to reverse in 2Q over the balance of the year?

Stephen Riney: Yes. Arun. Yes, as I’ve indicated earlier, there was a $500 million working capital increase. $300 million of that was because of a paydown of accrued compensation obligations that were accrued through the 2022 calendar year, and $100 million of that was due to the paydown of other payables, other accounts payable. And then there were a bunch of other small items, ups and downs, that amounted to the full $500 million. And I did indicate that buried within that was the $180 million increase in Egypt accounts receivable. I think that most of that is going to reverse during 2023. As every quarter, we accrue the incentive compensation that will be payable at the — in the first quarter of the following year. So a lot of that’s just going to reaccrue as we go through calendar year 2023.

Arun Jayaram: Great. And just my follow-up, maybe for David. David, in order to hit, call it, the midpoint of the full year oil guide, the business would have to average oil production in the upper 160s for the back half of the year. Just — it sounds like your 2Q guide is a little conservative. But maybe if you could help us walk through and give us comfort on hitting those levels because the midpoint is 159 for oil.

David Pursell: Are we — we’re talking Egypt gross?

Arun Jayaram: No, just full year oil or the component.

David Pursell: Yes. So I think there’s a — if you — without getting into the granularity of each asset, we feel confident in the ability to hit the Egypt exit to exit. The U.S. is going to grow. We have 21 wells coming online in the second quarter. We have more than that in the third quarter. A fair number of the wells that were brought online in the first quarter were 3 milers that were brought on towards the end of the quarter. So we feel good about the U.S. ability to execute. And then on the North Sea, which is kind of because of the EPL, everyone’s kind of forgot about that, but we’re actually having a pretty good operating success so far this year in the North Sea, both with platform operating efficiency. But we also brought on a really nice well at the end of the first quarter, and we have another well to store.

It’s the last subsea well that the Ocean Patriot drilled. It will be online here relatively quickly. That’s going to be a little bit higher gas mix, which in the North Sea is not a bad thing right now. So we feel really comfortable with our ability to hit the portfolio growth targets.

Operator: Our next question comes from Leo Mariani at Ross MKM.

Leo Mariani: Just a question here on Suriname. Obviously, you guys are still going through the appraisal process at Krabdagu, but perspective oil there, if you look at it in the radio and what you’ve already done appraisal wise at are kind of enough to move forward with the development of a nice pool of oil here?

John Christmann: Yes, you’re cutting out for most of your questions. So I think it’s — do we have enough. And I think the answer is, as we’ve said all along with Krabdagu, we’re looking at an oil hub, which incorporates both Sapakara and Krabdagu. And the thing we’ve been focused on is a scope and scale right. So at this point, it’s all I’ll say the connected original in place. We put in the documents this morning does not include the appraisal work from Krabdagu yet. So we’re making good progress.

Leo Mariani: Okay. That’s helpful. And then just on the U.S. side, Alpine High, you got 3 wells. You kind of mentioned that you’re pleased with the progress. I was hoping to maybe get little more color on those 3 wells in terms of maybe how long you’ve been flow testing? And then I guess, is there any update on the Austin Chalk for APA?

John Christmann: At this point, no update on the Chalk. And on the Alpine wells, we’re flowing them back at constrained rates, but we’re very pleased with the deliverability and the early results.

Operator: Our next question comes from Roger Read at Wells Fargo Securities.

Roger Read: Yes. I guess maybe follow up a little bit on some of the oilfield inflation, deflation issues and broaden it beyond the U.S. to take a look at what the currency issues might portend for the cost structure in Egypt. Or does that not matter given the overall structure of the contract there in terms of the net barrel performance?

John Christmann: Well, number one, there’s not a lot of competition for rigs or services in Egypt, right? So we’ve seen pretty stable cost with the devaluation that’s actually helped cost structure now. But as I said earlier, we are assisting our nationals and doing some things to help with the inflation.

Roger Read: So you wouldn’t expect a net reduction given like you said, kind of devaluation issues.

John Christmann: No, not big. Not big.

Roger Read: Okay. And then in the U.S., you mentioned obviously contract structure in place. But I was just curious, are you looking at indexed contracts? When is the next time we should see any potential for an inflection up or down in terms of the next contract rollover as we think about the rigs and the services?

John Christmann: We kind of keep a portfolio where some are on long term, some are on short and some are multiyear. And so it’s a constant process of rejigging those, and that’s kind of underway now and will continue. But it’s not going to have a near-term material impact on our current cost structure of this year’s capital program. So it will really start to show up in the $24 next year.

Operator: Our next question comes from David Deckelbaum at TD Cowen.

David Deckelbaum: I just wanted to follow up a little bit on just Alpine High. The decision, obviously, to reduce activity there makes sense in light of commodity pricing. But as we think about fulfilling contracts like the Cheniere contract and others, are you content to just fill with third-party gas? Or is there a certain level of organic gas that you’d like to maintain out of Alpine High as you get into ’24?

Stephen Riney: No. For quite some time, our is that every molecule of gas we produce in the Permian Basin is sold in the Permian Basin, and our trading organization will take care of both the long-haul transport obligations through purchasing and selling gas, and we’ll also take care of the Cheniere contract with purchased gas.

David Deckelbaum: Got it. And then maybe if I could just wrap up on Suriname. I guess as we think about moving towards an investment decision, do you anticipate that we’ll have enough data points, just given some of the Krabdagu delineation and appraisal work in combination with we already know at Sapakara to reach a decision this year. Is that in line with your internal thinking?

John Christmann: I would just say we’re waiting to see results, right? I mean we’re making good progress. As I’ve said a number of times, we’re kind of focused on potential scope and scale of what that first project would look like as there’s an incentive for everybody to size upwardly. But we’ll know when we get there.

Operator: Our next question comes from Kevin MacCurdy at Pickering Energy Partners.

Unidentified Analyst: There’s been much discussion in this earnings season about potential deflation on shale well costs, but I’m curious what you’re seeing on the international side. Outside of the increased receivables, what is your view on raw materials and services in Egypt and the North Sea? And how is that trending relative to last year?

John Christmann: Well, in general, we — like I said a few minutes ago, we don’t have a lot of competition for services in Egypt. So it really kind of goes with the commodity fuels up, for the most part, chemicals. In the North Sea, we’re going to be popping the Ocean Patriot. So if anything, capital spending is dropping there, but nothing major, nothing surprising in the way of the international service side.

David Deckelbaum: Great. And congratulations on reducing your 2023 CapEx budget. Kind of going back to the Ocean Patriot rig, are the savings from dropping that rig already built into your updated budget you released yesterday? Or have those savings effectively been redirected to the Permian?

John Christmann: They were in the plant from early on them because we plan to drop that rig midyear at the start of the year.

Operator: Our next question comes from Neil Mehta at Goldman Sachs & Co.

Neil Mehta: John, as you started off in your remarks, there’s a lot of uncertainty in the near term as it relates to the commodity price and the global economy. And so I’d love your perspective on how you as an organization are building downside resilience if there is a harder landing. And what are the lessons learned from experiences in 2015 and 2020 that you can carry forward? And one of the things that I think you guys have made terrific progress on since COVID has been really cleaning up the balance sheet and taking out $3 billion worth of debt. So maybe you could speak to where you are in that route.

John Christmann: Well, I’ll say a few comments and I’ll let Steve jump in on the balance sheet. But I’d say, first and foremost, the best flexibility you have is being able to reduce your activity. And you’ve seen us do that with the lean gas drilling in the U.S. You’ve seen us do that in the North Sea. So when it’s time to stop investing, you need to stop investing. And those are the lessons we’ve learned. Stay focused on cost and maintain that flexibility to invest in the projects that are going to continue to generate the long-term returns.

Stephen Riney: Yes. I’d just add that in the last two — quarter years, we’ve reduced debt by $3.2 billion while also buying back $2.4 billion worth of equity. The biggest thing, I think we accomplished in the bond reduction, the debt reduction flows in the near term. And in the near-term maturities, we’ve got 30% of our bond debt matures here in the next — well, between now and 2030. And only around $350 million of that matures in the next 5 years. So we don’t have much of a runway to worry about. And then 70% of our debt is 2037 and beyond. We’ve got some — we’ve got a really good profile for debt maturities as well. And then the last thing I would add is cost management. John talked about the ability to reduce the capital budget, but we’ve been very disciplined on managing our cost structure as well. Keeping that low helps certainly build resiliency.

Neil Mehta: Can you remind us where you are in terms of getting to investment grade with all the agencies? And given what you’ve done with the balance sheet, I feel like you’re getting close . So any perspective on.

Stephen Riney: Yes. Maybe you could kind of help us next time we go talk to the rating agencies, but appreciate that. But we feel like — well, we talked to the rating agencies at least twice a year. We are investment grade with Fitch now, and we’re on positive outlook for an increase to investment grade with S&P and Moody’s. We have talked to them recently. We’ll see what happens. I think we — as you’ve kind of alluded to there, I think we are due for an upgrade. Hopefully, that comes in 2023. And I think we trade — I mean we benchmarked very well compared to some of our peers that are already investment grade. So I think we are due for that.

Operator: Our next question comes from Jeoffrey Lambujon at TPH & Co.

Jeoffrey Lambujon: Maybe a few on the Permian ex Alpine High. First one is just on what your outlook is for productivity out of your Midland and Delaware this year just relative to the last few years and relative to internal expectations for what’s left on inventory and then what aspects of the program operationally you’re spending the most time on today from a design perspective. I think you noted the 3 milers earlier, I’d be curious on how you think about the mix of those in the program over time and how much inventory that might apply to and, again, if you’re thinking about any other areas we’re spending time on.

David Pursell: Yes. So Jeffrey, good questions. This is Dave. On the 3 miler question first, we tend to like to drill 3 milers where the acreage is set up for that. It’s very capital efficient. We’ve been able to execute those really well, both on the drilling and the completion. So where it’s possible, we’ll do that. But I think you should think about the majority of our portfolio or 2-mile laterals. So the typical well is going to be a 2-miler. On productivity, we continue to — the team’s work and study and try to squeeze out productivity gains on every pad we get on — and we continue to have pretty good results with that. So we’re — I don’t know how you think about that externally if we’ve got some — a pretty good process in place and feel comfortable with it. We’ve got a good methodical pace of drilling and completions and are pleased with that pace at this point.

Jeoffrey Lambujon: Great, Dave. My next one is just on the sustainability of that productivity that you’re seeing today, you could frame inventory depth as you look at the Midland and Delaware individually if we just kind of assume maybe the current pace for starters on an annual basis. And then I’d also be interested in how to think about steady state quarterly run rate activity as we think about next year, just given the shape of the program this year that was referenced earlier in the Q&A with that dynamic of Q3 completion count in the low 20s and Q4 going into the low teens or a little bit lower exiting the year.

David Pursell: Yes. So inventory, we’ve consistently said we’ve got line of sight kind of through the end of the decade. And we keep adding things to it. And that number will move around over time. At the current cadence, I think you could look at the second and third quarter activity pace and roll that through into ’24, but we haven’t really given guidance yet on ’24 on what the capital program and activity would look like. We’re assuming that we kind of hold serve on productivity gains. But again, the aspiration is to continue to squeeze more out of each completion.

Operator: I would now like to turn it back to John Christmann for closing remarks.

John Christmann: Thank you. Before closing the call, I want to leave you with the following thoughts. First, our asset teams are executing well. Safety performance continues to be good, and contributions from our drilling programs are strong. We are managing the portfolio to optimize returns and near-term cash flow and keenly focused on cost control. Second, we continue to make good progress on our appraisal program in Suriname and look forward to sharing more information in the future. Lastly, we remain committed to returning at least 60% of annual free cash flow to investors through dividends and buybacks and believe our stock is a compelling investment. We plan to participate in a number of investor events over the next 2 months and look forward to seeing you. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you for your participation in today’s conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.